On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:06:49PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Uh, you broke asciidoctor 1.5.2. ;-) LOL
>
> I installed the Asciidoctor Firefox plugin:
Asciidoctor has confirmed they have a bug and hope to fix it in their
next release:
http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Problem-with-ta
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:25:48PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> Slightly updated patch attached and applied. I moved asciidoc after
> HTML in the list, rather than at the end. Thanks for everyone's hard
> work on this.
>
>
> I think I done gone broke it:
>
> CREATE TABLE "| 3^.||moo
On 31 March 2015 at 16:35, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:12:41AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:37:08PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Bruce Momjian
> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:18:58PM +0900, Mi
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:12:41AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:37:08PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:18:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > >> > [options="header",cols=" > >>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:37:08PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:18:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> > [options="header",cols=" >> > |
> >> > |5 2.2+^.^ |4 2.2+^.^
> >> > |2 2.2+^.^ |3 2.2+^.^
> >> >
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:18:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> > [options="header",cols="> > |
>> > |5 2.2+^.^ |4 2.2+^.^
>> > |2 2.2+^.^ |3 2.2+^.^
>> > |
>>
>> Hm. This is still incorrect. You should remove options="header" her
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:18:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > [options="header",cols=" > |
> > |5 2.2+^.^ |4 2.2+^.^
> > |2 2.2+^.^ |3 2.2+^.^
> > |
>
> Hm. This is still incorrect. You should remove options="header" here
> or the first tuple is treated as a header in the case
> non
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:15:33AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > Notice the added 'l' next to the '<'. Updated patch attached. Any
>> > other issues?
>>
>> Ah, right. That's a go
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:15:33AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Notice the added 'l' next to the '<'. Updated patch attached. Any
> > other issues?
>
> Ah, right. That's a good catch and your patch fixes the issue. Still,
> there are p
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Notice the added 'l' next to the '<'. Updated patch attached. Any
> other issues?
Ah, right. That's a good catch and your patch fixes the issue. Still,
there are problems with the tuple-only mode and the expanded mode. For
example using thi
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 08:06:17PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > I have updated the attached patch to do as you suggested. Please also
> > test the \x output. Thanks.
>
> Indeed. If I use a specific column name like this one, I am seeing
> problems with the expanded mode:
> =# create table "
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 09:20:03PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> This does not work:
>> =# create table "5 2.2+^.^" ();
>> CREATE TABLE
>> =# \pset format asciidoc
>> Output format is asciidoc.
>> =# \d
>>
>> .List of relations
>> [option
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 09:20:03PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> This does not work:
> =# create table "5 2.2+^.^" ();
> CREATE TABLE
> =# \pset format asciidoc
> Output format is asciidoc.
> =# \d
>
> .List of relations
> [options="header",cols=" |
> ^l|Schema ^l|Name ^l|Type ^l|Owner
> |pu
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I was able to fix all the reported problems with the attached patch.
> I used this for testing the output:
>
> https://asciidoclive.com/
>
> Is it OK now?
This does not work:
=# create table "5 2.2+^.^" ();
CREATE TABLE
=# \pset form
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 03:52:30PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > I see a trailing spaces, but I don't see a described effect. Please, can you
> > send some more specific test case?
>
> This formatting problem is trivial to reproduce:
> =# create table "foo" ();
>
> CREATE TABLE
> Time: 9.826
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> This patch has been marked as "Waiting on Author" for a couple of
> weeks, and the problems mentioned before have not been completely
> addressed, hence marking this patch as returned with feedback. It
> would be nice to see progress for the
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2014-11-07 22:37 GMT+01:00 Alvaro Herrera :
>>
>>
>> I did \o /tmp/tst, then
>> \dS
>> create table "eh | oh" ();
>> \dS
>>
>> and then filtered the output file to HTML. The CREATE TABLE tag ended
>> up in the same line as the title of the f
Hi
2014-11-07 22:37 GMT+01:00 Alvaro Herrera :
>
> I did \o /tmp/tst, then
> \dS
> create table "eh | oh" ();
> \dS
>
> and then filtered the output file to HTML. The CREATE TABLE tag ended
> up in the same line as the title of the following table. I think
> there's a newline is missing somewhe
Hi
I can fix reported bugs today or tomorrow
Regards
Pavel
2014-11-14 21:00 GMT+01:00 Szymon Guz :
>
> On 14 November 2014 20:57, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
>
>> Is anyone going to submit a new version of this patch?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Hi Alvaro,
> due to family issues I will not be able to work on it
On 14 November 2014 20:57, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Is anyone going to submit a new version of this patch?
>
>
>
Hi Alvaro,
due to family issues I will not be able to work on it for the next 10 days.
regards,
Szymon
Is anyone going to submit a new version of this patch?
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.p
I did \o /tmp/tst, then
\dS
create table "eh | oh" ();
\dS
and then filtered the output file to HTML. The CREATE TABLE tag ended
up in the same line as the title of the following table. I think
there's a newline is missing somewhere.
The good news is that the | in the table name was processed
2014-10-30 9:30 GMT+01:00 Szymon Guz :
> On 30 October 2014 09:04, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 2014-10-29 12:23 GMT+01:00 Szymon Guz :
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17 October 2014 09:01, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>>
Hi Szymon
I found a small bug - it doesn't escape "|" well
postgre
On 30 October 2014 09:04, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> 2014-10-29 12:23 GMT+01:00 Szymon Guz :
>
>>
>>
>> On 17 October 2014 09:01, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Szymon
>>>
>>> I found a small bug - it doesn't escape "|" well
>>>
>>> postgres=# select * from mytab ;
>>> a | numeric_b |
2014-10-29 12:23 GMT+01:00 Szymon Guz :
>
>
> On 17 October 2014 09:01, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> Hi Szymon
>>
>> I found a small bug - it doesn't escape "|" well
>>
>> postgres=# select * from mytab ;
>> a | numeric_b | c
>> --+---+
>> Ahoj |1
On 17 October 2014 09:01, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi Szymon
>
> I found a small bug - it doesn't escape "|" well
>
> postgres=# select * from mytab ;
> a | numeric_b | c
> --+---+
> Ahoj |10 | 2014-10-17
> Hello|20 | 2014-10-18
> H
Hi Szymon
I found a small bug - it doesn't escape "|" well
postgres=# select * from mytab ;
a | numeric_b | c
--+---+
Ahoj |10 | 2014-10-17
Hello|20 | 2014-10-18
Hi |30 | 2014-10-19
aaa| | | 2014-10-17
On 17 September 2014 19:55, Szymon Guz wrote:
>
>
> On 17 September 2014 19:30, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> On 9/16/14 3:52 PM, Szymon Guz wrote:
>> > It's not finished yet, I'm not sure it there is any sense in supporting
>> > border types etc.
>>
>> AFAICT, Asciidoc doesn't support border typ
On 17 September 2014 19:30, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/16/14 3:52 PM, Szymon Guz wrote:
> > It's not finished yet, I'm not sure it there is any sense in supporting
> > border types etc.
>
> AFAICT, Asciidoc doesn't support border types, so (if so) you should
> just ignore that setting.
>
Too
On 9/16/14 3:52 PM, Szymon Guz wrote:
> It's not finished yet, I'm not sure it there is any sense in supporting
> border types etc.
AFAICT, Asciidoc doesn't support border types, so (if so) you should
just ignore that setting.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
2014-09-16 21:52 GMT+02:00 Szymon Guz :
> Hi,
> I've been working a little bit on a patch for printing tables in asciidoc
> with psql.
>
> It's not finished yet, I'm not sure it there is any sense in supporting
> border types etc. The code is not cleared so far, but any remarks on the
> style not
El 16/09/14 16:52, Szymon Guz escribió:
> Hi,
> I've been working a little bit on a patch for printing tables in
> asciidoc with psql.
>
> It's not finished yet, I'm not sure it there is any sense in
> supporting border types etc. The code is not cleared so far, but any
> remarks on the style not
Hi,
I've been working a little bit on a patch for printing tables in asciidoc
with psql.
It's not finished yet, I'm not sure it there is any sense in supporting
border types etc. The code is not cleared so far, but any remarks on the
style not playing well with the normal postgres style of code ar
33 matches
Mail list logo