On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:37:08PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:18:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> > [options="header",cols="<l,<l",frame="none"] > >> > |==== > >> > |5 2.2+^.^ |4 2.2+^.^ > >> > |2 2.2+^.^ |3 2.2+^.^ > >> > |==== > >> > >> Hm. This is still incorrect. You should remove options="header" here > >> or the first tuple is treated as a header in the case > >> non-expanded/tuple-only. Your patch removes correctly the header for > >> the expanded/tuple-only case though. > >> Regards, > > > > OK, fixed. Thanks for the testing. Patch attached. New output: > > This time things look good from my side. I have played with this patch > some time, testing some crazy scenarios and I have not found problems. > That's cool stuff, thanks!
Wow, thanks. I never would have gotten here without your help. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers