Hello,
there's a new archive available with a bugfix for handling null values.
Thanks to Steve Head for reporting this.
http://ads.ufp.de/projects/Pg/
Regards
--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
---(end of broadcast)
Andreas Scherbaum wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Andreas Scherbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On the other hand, i copied some parts from contrib/noupdate (there'e no
> > > licence in the readme) and now i think, this is contributed under BSD
> > > licence.
> > > I'm sure or i'm wrong? I
Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Note also that one of the big problems we experienced was with clause
> three of BSD-style licenses (the attribution clause).
Fortunately, Berkeley had already stopped using the advertising clause
when they tossed Postgres over the fence. Our version do
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Andreas Scherbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On the other hand, i copied some parts from contrib/noupdate (there'e no
> > licence in the readme) and now i think, this is contributed under BSD
> > licence.
> > I'm sure or i'm wrong? I think, i have to change the licence.
>
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Alexandre Dulaunoy wrote:
> Yes, I have read the faq. The 1.2 is not responding why the modified
> Berkeley-style BSD license was choosen. There is only a respond :"because
> is like that..."
You would have to ask the Regents of the University of California at
Berkeley, not
Andreas Scherbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the other hand, i copied some parts from contrib/noupdate (there'e no
> licence in the readme) and now i think, this is contributed under BSD
> licence.
> I'm sure or i'm wrong? I think, i have to change the licence.
> Who is the author of the nou
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Andreas Scherbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Justin Clift wrote:
> >> Did we reach an opinion as to whether we'll include GPL'd code?
> >>
> >> My vote is to not include this code, as it just muddies the water with
> >> PostgreSQL being BSD based.
>
> > Hmm, there's enou
...
> Thanks a lot for the excellent software.
My personal view is that one might consider using the same BSD license
as PostgreSQL itself as a gesture of appreciation for the software you
are using. Contribute or not, it is your choice. But if you are
benefiting from the software (and lots of fo
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexandre Dulaunoy) would
write:
> On 18 Apr 2002, Doug McNaught wrote:
>
>> Alexandre Dulaunoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > first comment :
>> >
>> > * a special directory with ./contrib/gpl ?
>>
>> Doesn't really change anythi
first comment :
* a special directory with ./contrib/gpl ?
second comment :
* I don't really understand your position regarding the GNU General Public
License. The GPL is offering multiple advantages for a big project and
software like PostgreSQL. For example :
* Contribution
Alexandre Dulaunoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * I don't really understand your position regarding the GNU General Public
> License. The GPL is offering multiple advantages for a big project and
> software like PostgreSQL.
Every month or two a newbie pops up and asks us why Postgres isn't
Alexandre Dulaunoy wrote:
> > Not open for discussion. See the FAQ.
>
> I love that type of respond ;-)
>
> Yes, I have read the faq. The 1.2 is not responding why the modified
> Berkeley-style BSD license was choosen. There is only a respond :"because
> is like that..."
>
> I have also re
On 18 Apr 2002, Doug McNaught wrote:
> Alexandre Dulaunoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > first comment :
> >
> > * a special directory with ./contrib/gpl ?
>
> Doesn't really change anything.
>
> > second comment :
> >
> > * I don't really understand your position regarding the GNU Gener
Justin Clift wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Did we reach an opinion as to whether we'll include GPL'd code?
>
> My vote is to not include this code, as it just muddies the water with
> PostgreSQL being BSD based.
Yes, our current policy is to add GPL to /contrib only when we have
little choice and the
Alexandre Dulaunoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> first comment :
>
> * a special directory with ./contrib/gpl ?
Doesn't really change anything.
> second comment :
>
> * I don't really understand your position regarding the GNU General Public
> License. The GPL is offering multiple advanta
first comment :
* a special directory with ./contrib/gpl ?
second comment :
* I don't really understand your position regarding the GNU General Public
License. The GPL is offering multiple advantages for a big project and
software like PostgreSQL. For example :
* Contribution b
Andreas Scherbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Justin Clift wrote:
>> Did we reach an opinion as to whether we'll include GPL'd code?
>>
>> My vote is to not include this code, as it just muddies the water with
>> PostgreSQL being BSD based.
> Hmm, there's enough GPL'ed stuff in contrib/ ;-)
I
Justin Clift wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Did we reach an opinion as to whether we'll include GPL'd code?
>
> My vote is to not include this code, as it just muddies the water with
> PostgreSQL being BSD based.
>
> :-)
>
Hmm, there's enough GPL'ed stuff in contrib/ ;-)
--
Hi Bruce,
Did we reach an opinion as to whether we'll include GPL'd code?
My vote is to not include this code, as it just muddies the water with
PostgreSQL being BSD based.
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Andreas Scherbaum wrote:
>
> Justin Clift wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > H
Justin Clift wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Haven't looked at the code, but there's no license with it.
>
> Andreas, are you cool with having the same License as PostgreSQL for it
> (BSD license)?
>
> :-)
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Can someone c
Hi Bruce,
Haven't looked at the code, but there's no license with it.
Andreas, are you cool with having the same License as PostgreSQL for it
(BSD license)?
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Can someone comment on this? I can't decide.
>
> ---
Can someone comment on this? I can't decide.
---
Andreas Scherbaum wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> i have written a module for logging changes on a table (without knowing
> the exact column names).
> Dont know where to put it, but
22 matches
Mail list logo
