Nicolai Petri wrote:
> If people hate contrib so much why not just get rid of it forever.. Either it
> should embrace as much small contrib modules as possible - else it should
> disappear in my opinion.
Actually that's partly the intention. Several contrib modules have been
removed in the rec
On Wednesday 03 May 2006 19:49, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:06:09PM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> > hi
> > some time ago i was told on postgresql-general about existence of
> > "hstore" package for postgresql.
> > as i understand it is being developed by the same gu
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:06:09PM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> hi
> some time ago i was told on postgresql-general about existence of "hstore"
> package for postgresql.
> as i understand it is being developed by the same guys that are behind
> tsearch2, gin and (at least) recent chang
hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
i have number of projects coming to my mind which could take advantage
of something like this. the simplest thing is e-commerce site, where all
custom fields (fields dependand on product type) can be stored in one,
easily retrievable, field - thus reducing data
hisome time ago i was told on postgresql-general about existence of "hstore" package for postgresql.as i understand it is being developed by the same guys that are behind tsearch2, gin and (at least) recent changes in gist.
would it be possible to include this software in main postgresql tarball? i
