Re: [HACKERS] hash indexes and HS was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby)

2010-04-14 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 10:41 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Jaime Casanova > wrote: > > > > another point, what happened with this: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1229549172.4793.105.ca...@ebony.2ndquadrant? > > Obviously we still have the problem wit

[HACKERS] hash indexes and HS was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby)

2010-04-13 Thread Jaime Casanova
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Jaime Casanova wrote: > > another point, what happened with this: > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1229549172.4793.105.ca...@ebony.2ndquadrant? > Obviously we still have the problem with hash indexes, and in that > thread Tom advice was just to document