On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Jaime Casanova <jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec> wrote: > > another point, what happened with this: > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1229549172.4793.105.ca...@ebony.2ndquadrant? > Obviously we still have the problem with hash indexes, and in that > thread Tom advice was just to document the issue and while that could > be fine at least we should be emitting better messages, consider this > one that i got on the standby server (where 4658650 is the oid of a > hash index): > """ > mic=# explain analyze select * from tt1 where col1 = 5000; > ERROR: could not read block 0 in file "base/21958/4658650": read only > 0 of 8192 bytes > """ >
-- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
