2011/12/7 ben hockey :
>
> On Dec 7, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> On tis, 2011-12-06 at 15:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> TBH, I think that inventing a new datestyle setting "ECMA" would be a
>
> more appropriate investment of effort.
>
>
> So we'd have a setting called "ECMA" that'
On Dec 7, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On tis, 2011-12-06 at 15:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
TBH, I think that inventing a new datestyle setting "ECMA" would be a
more appropriate investment of effort.
So we'd have a setting called "ECMA" that's really ISO, and a setting
called "IS
On tis, 2011-12-06 at 15:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> TBH, I think that inventing a new datestyle setting "ECMA" would be a
> more appropriate investment of effort.
So we'd have a setting called "ECMA" that's really ISO, and a setting
called "ISO" that's really SQL, and a setting called "SQL" that'
Hello
2011/12/6 ben hockey :
> i may have spoken a little too soon about the format being right... i just
> took a look at the postgres source code and it would need one more change to
> completely meet my needs. EncodeDateTime should put a 'Z' for UTC timezone
> rather than '+0'. with this bei
i may have spoken a little too soon about the format being right... i
just took a look at the postgres source code and it would need one more
change to completely meet my needs. EncodeDateTime should put a 'Z' for
UTC timezone rather than '+0'. with this being the case, do you think
there wo
2011/12/6 ben hockey :
>
>
> On 12/6/2011 4:19 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> it can be in 9.2 (if will be accepted) - it will be release at summer 2012
>>
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Pavel Stehule
>
>
> ok, so i assume your patch is now considered "sub
On 12/6/2011 4:19 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
it can be in 9.2 (if will be accepted) - it will be release at summer 2012
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch
Regards
Pavel Stehule
ok, so i assume your patch is now considered "submitted" and is waiting
to be reviewed. i'll wait
2011/12/6 ben hockey :
>
>
> On 12/6/2011 3:53 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> I am not sure, if this patch is 100% correct
>>
>> but it does something
>>
>> the name is not ECMA but XSD - I hope, so both formats are same
>
>
> that format works for me. in fact a simple test to see if it would do w
On 12/6/2011 3:53 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am not sure, if this patch is 100% correct
but it does something
the name is not ECMA but XSD - I hope, so both formats are same
that format works for me. in fact a simple test to see if it would do
what i hope for would be to open the develope
2011/12/6 ben hockey :
>
> On 12/6/2011 3:20 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>>
>> I am for ECMA datestyle
>>
>> it is there but just is not public, if I remember well
>>
>> Theoretically some custom output/input transform routine can be very
>> interesting - for domains, for boolean type - but on seco
2011/12/6 ben hockey :
>
> On 12/6/2011 3:20 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>>
>> I am for ECMA datestyle
>>
>> it is there but just is not public, if I remember well
>>
>> Theoretically some custom output/input transform routine can be very
>> interesting - for domains, for boolean type - but on seco
On 12/6/2011 3:20 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am for ECMA datestyle
it is there but just is not public, if I remember well
Theoretically some custom output/input transform routine can be very
interesting - for domains, for boolean type - but on second hand - the
usage of this feature is minima
2011/12/6 Tom Lane :
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Ben Hockey wrote:
>>> i know its been over a year without any activity on this thread but did
>>> anything ever come of this? i'd really like to be able to get dates to
>>> match the format specified for date time stri
Robert Haas writes:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Ben Hockey wrote:
>> i know its been over a year without any activity on this thread but did
>> anything ever come of this? i'd really like to be able to get dates to
>> match the format specified for date time strings in ecmascript 5. a gen
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Ben Hockey wrote:
> i know its been over a year without any activity on this thread but did
> anything ever come of this? i'd really like to be able to get dates to
> match the format specified for date time strings in ecmascript 5. a generic
> way to specify the
i know its been over a year without any activity on this thread but did
anything ever come of this? i'd really like to be able to get dates to
match the format specified for date time strings in ecmascript 5. a
generic way to specify the format would be ideal if it can be done
securely. has ther
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Ben Hockey wrote:
> thanks for looking into adding this feature. custom formats for parsing and
> formatting of dates would certainly be the better option if it can be done
> securely.
Well, Pavel expressed a concern about SQL injection, but I can't see
why that
On May 19, 2010, at 4:31 AM, Mike Fowler wrote:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/5/19 Peter Eisentraut :
On tis, 2010-05-18 at 18:26 -0400, Ben Hockey wrote:
ecmascript 5 is the most recent specification for JavaScript and i
would think that having a DATESTYLE format to simplify
interoperability
2010/5/19 Mike Fowler :
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> 2010/5/19 Mike Fowler :
>>
>>>
>>> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>>
see google: lateral sql injection oracle NLS_DATE_FORMAT
I would to like this functionality too - and technically I don't see a
problem - It's less than 100 line
Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/5/19 Mike Fowler :
Pavel Stehule wrote:
see google: lateral sql injection oracle NLS_DATE_FORMAT
I would to like this functionality too - and technically I don't see a
problem - It's less than 100 lines, but I don't need a new security
problem. So my proposal
2010/5/19 Mike Fowler :
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> see google: lateral sql injection oracle NLS_DATE_FORMAT
>>
>> I would to like this functionality too - and technically I don't see a
>> problem - It's less than 100 lines, but I don't need a new security
>> problem. So my proposal is change noth
Pavel Stehule wrote:
see google: lateral sql injection oracle NLS_DATE_FORMAT
I would to like this functionality too - and technically I don't see a
problem - It's less than 100 lines, but I don't need a new security
problem. So my proposal is change nothing on this integrated
functionality and
2010/5/19 Mike Fowler :
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> 2010/5/19 Peter Eisentraut :
>>
>>>
>>> On tis, 2010-05-18 at 18:26 -0400, Ben Hockey wrote:
>>>
ecmascript 5 is the most recent specification for JavaScript and i
would think that having a DATESTYLE format to simplify
interop
Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/5/19 Peter Eisentraut :
On tis, 2010-05-18 at 18:26 -0400, Ben Hockey wrote:
ecmascript 5 is the most recent specification for JavaScript and i
would think that having a DATESTYLE format to simplify
interoperability with JavaScript applications would be highly
2010/5/19 Peter Eisentraut :
> On tis, 2010-05-18 at 18:26 -0400, Ben Hockey wrote:
>> ecmascript 5 is the most recent specification for JavaScript and i
>> would think that having a DATESTYLE format to simplify
>> interoperability with JavaScript applications would be highly
>> desirable.
>
> Note
On tis, 2010-05-18 at 18:26 -0400, Ben Hockey wrote:
> ecmascript 5 is the most recent specification for JavaScript and i
> would think that having a DATESTYLE format to simplify
> interoperability with JavaScript applications would be highly
> desirable.
Note that we haven't got any other datesty
2010/5/19 Robert Haas :
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Ben Hockey wrote:
>> hi,
>> i mistakenly had posted this to pgsql-bugs already and got a response (see
>> below - edited). i'm posting here since afaik it is the way i should be
>> requesting new features. my suggestion is to add a DATES
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Ben Hockey wrote:
> hi,
> i mistakenly had posted this to pgsql-bugs already and got a response (see
> below - edited). i'm posting here since afaik it is the way i should be
> requesting new features. my suggestion is to add a DATESTYLE format to
> match the for
hi,
i mistakenly had posted this to pgsql-bugs already and got a response
(see below - edited). i'm posting here since afaik it is the way i
should be requesting new features. my suggestion is to add a
DATESTYLE format to match the format specified for date time strings
in ecmascript 5.
29 matches
Mail list logo
