On 12/6/2011 3:20 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am for ECMA datestyle
it is there but just is not public, if I remember well
Theoretically some custom output/input transform routine can be very
interesting - for domains, for boolean type - but on second hand - the
usage of this feature is minimal and there is risk for less advanced
users - so ECMA datestyle is very adequate solution.
Regards
Pavel
i don't particularly need anything other than ECMA datestyle - i was
just under the impression that a more generic solution was preferred.
so, ECMA is enough to stop me from making any more noise about this.
pavel, is there a way i can use this currently? if not, would it take
much effort to make this public?
thanks,
ben...
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
