Hello,
O.k. I have installed the stable bugzilla at:
http://pgbugs.commandprompt.com/
I would expect that this domain would change to:
http://bugs.postgresql.org/ or something
It is backed to a PostgreSQL 8.1 database and anyone can now create
accounts.
Now what I need.
I need a couple of
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
---
Hello,
My name is <> and I work with postgresql group. Recently we/postgresql
advocay/general group have decided to form a group of people who would help
other projects w.r.t postgresql.
So feel free to ask me que
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> ---
> Hello,
>
> My name is <> and I work with postgresql group. Recently we/postgresql
> advocay/general group have decided to form a group of people who would help
> other projects w.r.t postgresql.
>
> So feel free to ask me questions.
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
Your suggestion elsewhere of "pick your second favourite app" is likely
to result in a more scattergun approach. Also, if it had the imprimatur
of the PostgreSQL community to some extent appraoches to projects might
be more welcome - "Dear open-so
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> Your suggestion elsewhere of "pick your second favourite app" is likely
> to result in a more scattergun approach. Also, if it had the imprimatur
> of the PostgreSQL community to some extent appraoches to projects might
> be more welcome - "Dear open-source-project-manager
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 09:42, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Shridhar Daithankar writes:
> >>I think so too.. I have been planning to do that for dbmail and egroupware
> >>but haven't got around it..
> > When I said "I've been doing a bit of that", I meant "the developers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Shridhar Daithankar writes:
So forming a new group is quite beneficial?
No, we don't need one group, we need many individuals (or possibly small
groups) to get in contact with their second favorite projects and hang out
there.
I meant lets form a group within advocacy wh
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
Seriously, I have wondered if it might be a good idea to assemble a
small "hit team" that would take some high profile open source projects
and make sure they worked with Postgres. Bugzilla would be the most
obvious candidate, but there are certai
Shridhar Daithankar writes:
> So forming a new group is quite beneficial?
No, we don't need one group, we need many individuals (or possibly small
groups) to get in contact with their second favorite projects and hang out
there.
> I think so too.. I have been planning to do that for dbmail and
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 19:19, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
> > Seriously, I have wondered if it might be a good idea to assemble a
> > small "hit team" that would take some high profile open source projects
> > and make sure they worked with Postgres. Bugzilla would be the
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> Seriously, I have wondered if it might be a good idea to assemble a
> small "hit team" that would take some high profile open source projects
> and make sure they worked with Postgres. Bugzilla would be the most
> obvious candidate, but there are certainly others. I suspec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously, I have wondered if it might be a good idea to assemble a
small "hit team" that would take some high profile open source
projects and make sure they worked with Postgres. Bugzilla would be
the most obvious candidate, but there are certainly others. I suspect
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 04:12:50PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >Seriously, I have wondered if it might be a good idea to assemble a
> >small "hit team" that would take some high profile open source projects
> >and make sure they worked with Postgres. Bugzilla would be the most
> >obv
Seriously, I have wondered if it might be a good idea to assemble a
small "hit team" that would take some high profile open source projects
and make sure they worked with Postgres. Bugzilla would be the most
obvious candidate, but there are certainly others. I suspect that could
be quite produc
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
The "doesn't quite make the best use of PG" quote is one of the best
examples of buck-passing I've seen in awhile. If Bugzilla had been
designed with some thought to DB independence to start with, we'd not
be having this discussion.
You have to laugh at an app
The "doesn't quite make the best use of PG" quote is one of the best
examples of buck-passing I've seen in awhile. If Bugzilla had been
designed with some thought to DB independence to start with, we'd not
be having this discussion.
You have to laugh at an app that actually uses MySQL's replicati
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The last comment on the bug page says:
> "The Red Hat guys did a quick 'n dirty port. It works, but doesn't
> quite make use of the best of PostgreSQL. Also, their tarball is out
> of date with the current schema used by Bugzilla."
> The bug is actua
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bugzilla is far from perfect. But it's getting better.
FWIW, I would like to try a bugzilla-based tracking system for Postgres.
Our last attempt at a tracking system failed miserably, but I think that
was (a) because the software w
18 matches
Mail list logo
