Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Shridhar Daithankar writes:


So forming a new group is quite beneficial?


No, we don't need one group, we need many individuals (or possibly small
groups) to get in contact with their second favorite projects and hang out
there.

I meant lets form a group within advocacy which would consult other projects. Since we would expect people to encounter similar kind of problem, a group within advocacy/general might be a good idea.


Of course we need not do anything special till we have sizable projets being consulted. Can we at least have a web page for projects that use/prefer postgresql. I think I put ahead such idea of cross linking earlier as well.

I think so too..  I have been planning to do that for dbmail and egroupware
but haven't got around it..
When I said "I've been doing a bit of that", I meant "the developers of
eGroupWare call me once a week with questions".  So maybe you can take
over dbmail. :-)

Sure. Check this.


-----------
Hello,

My name is <> and I work with postgresql group. Recently we/postgresql advocay/general group have decided to form a group of people who would help other projects w.r.t postgresql.

So feel free to ask me questions. I can help you to put yor questions to appropriate forums/persons effectively.

Regards
-----------

Sounds good? Or too aggressive?


Bye Shridhar


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to