On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:57:16AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Here: http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ are ports of several unix
> utility programs (including bison and flex) for win32. From my
> experiences compiling the Peer Direct port, this is the easiest way to
> get started.
OK, I'll thro
> > Below is the email that prompted me to add the derived files to
> > WIN32_DEV CVS.
>
> > However, most people don't want them in there, so I have removed them,
> > and updated the web page to recommend the nightly snapshots (which have
> > the derived files), and mentioned the tools that will
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:11 PM
To: Steve Novick
Cc: PostgreSQL-development; PostgreSQL Win32 port list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
> Below is the email that prompted me to add the derived files
Dann Corbit; Joerg Hessdoerfer;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL Win32 port list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
>
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >
> > > As you can see from the new "Compiling" web page, I just normally
>
On Friday 05 September 2003 00:17, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > As you can see from the new "Compiling" web page, I just normally
> > > compile under Unix, distclean, then Win32 compile via Samba.
> >
> > That isn't very efficient unless you have tw
On Thursday 04 September 2003 19:20, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Joerg Hessdoerfer writes:
> > I'm currently in the process of setting up my development environment
> > (how the heck do I get bison/flex to compile under MingW/MSYS? Oh my...),
>
> Use the Cygwin tools.
There is no need for that, MinG
On Thursday 04 September 2003 09:22, Joerg Hessdoerfer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks to all who have replied (privately or via the list), it seems
> sometimes it's just necessary to be a bit insistant!
>
> That said, I'm positively surprised by what has been done already
> (especially Bruce and Marc, thi
Dann Corbit wrote:
You are making an assumption that the follwing sentence is only valid
under conditions of the first. That is nowhere stated. That connection
is only implied by your interpretation.
Not at all. the phrase "This means" clearly refers to what went before.
Even a trivial and
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > As you can see from the new "Compiling" web page, I just normally
> > compile under Unix, distclean, then Win32 compile via Samba.
>
> That isn't very efficient unless you have two machines or use something
> like vmware.
One quick solution w
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:35 PM
> To: Postgresql Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
>
>
> Dann Corbit wrote:
>
> >>-Original Message-
> >
Dann Corbit wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jon Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:
Did you read this:
"This means that unless you m
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
>
>
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
> > Did you read this:
>
-Original Message-
From: Jon Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:
> Did you read this:
> "This means that unless you modify the to
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:27:58PM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote:
> Did you read this:
> "This means that unless you modify the tools so that compiled
> executables do not make use of the Cygwin library, your compiled
> programs will also have to be free software distributed under the GPL
> with source
Bruce Momjian writes:
> As you can see from the new "Compiling" web page, I just normally
> compile under Unix, distclean, then Win32 compile via Samba.
That isn't very efficient unless you have two machines or use something
like vmware.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:
> Did you read this:
> "This means that unless you modify the tools so that compiled
> executables do not make use of the Cygwin library, your compiled
> programs will also have to be free software distributed under the GPL
> with source code available to all
OTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
>
>
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
> > > Use the Cygwin tools.
> >
> > Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
&g
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:
> > Use the Cygwin tools.
>
> Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
It does? I don't see it:
http://cygwin.com/licensing.html
Jon
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
"Dann Corbit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
"Use" in the sense of distributing applications linked against it,
yes.
In this case I don't think it's a problem. The output of 'flex' and
'bison' is not required to be GPL (there is a specific exception
Doug McNaught wrote:
> "Dann Corbit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
>
> "Use" in the sense of distributing applications linked against it,
> yes.
>
> In this case I don't think it's a problem. The output of 'flex' and
> 'bison' is not required to
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joerg Hessdoerfer wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Thanks to all who have replied (privately or via the list), it seems sometimes
> > it's just necessary to be a bit insistant!
> >
> > That said, I'm positively surprised by what has been done already (especially
> > Bruce and Marc,
Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:20 AM
> To: Joerg Hessdoerfer
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native
Joerg Hessdoerfer writes:
> I'm currently in the process of setting up my development environment (how the
> heck do I get bison/flex to compile under MingW/MSYS? Oh my...),
Use the Cygwin tools.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)
Joerg Hessdoerfer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks to all who have replied (privately or via the list), it seems sometimes
> it's just necessary to be a bit insistant!
>
> That said, I'm positively surprised by what has been done already (especially
> Bruce and Marc, this is really a GoodThing to have t
Joerg Hessdoerfer kirjutas N, 04.09.2003 kell 10:22:
> I'm currently in the process of setting up my development environment (how the
> heck do I get bison/flex to compile under MingW/MSYS? Oh my...)
there is a precompiled bison in the MinGW filelist
http://www.mingw.org/download.shtml#hdr2
dunn
Hi!
Thanks to all who have replied (privately or via the list), it seems sometimes
it's just necessary to be a bit insistant!
That said, I'm positively surprised by what has been done already (especially
Bruce and Marc, this is really a GoodThing to have the web page and the
list).
I'm curren
just made sure the -win32 list is added to archives as well ...
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> OK, I have created a Win32 project page that contains all relevant
> information:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/win32.html
>
> I have CC'ed this to the new
OK, I have created a Win32 project page that contains all relevant
information:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/win32.html
I have CC'ed this to the new native win32 port mailing list as well.
---
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> So far as I'm aware Joerg, we didn't have enough time to get all the Win32
> stuff done for 7.4, and it was felt (rightly so) that it wasn't worth
> holding off on 7.4 to get it in.
>
> At the moment, the main developers are doing nothing but fixing bugs in 7.4
> a
Dann Corbit wrote:
> I sent signal code to Bruce Momjian that can be freely used in the
> project. It compiles on Win32 and has been contributed as BSD license.
>
> The architecture is a bit different from what had already been
> accomplished, so I don't know how hard it will be to splice it in.
Message-
> From: Sean Chittenden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:45 PM
> To: Merlin Moncure
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
>
>
> > Does anybody know of a BSD licensed signal implementation that
> Does anybody know of a BSD licensed signal implementation that
> compiles on win32?
See how Apache handles this problem (via APR?).
-sc
--
Sean Chittenden
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 6:13 PM
To: Joerg Hessdoerfer; Alexander Schulz; Hannu Krosing
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
> First, there was a branch created a couple of weeks
So far as I'm aware Joerg, we didn't have enough time to get all the Win32
stuff done for 7.4, and it was felt (rightly so) that it wasn't worth
holding off on 7.4 to get it in.
At the moment, the main developers are doing nothing but fixing bugs in 7.4
as we are now in feature freeze.
Once 7.4 f
]
tel 030.343462.40 / fax 030.343462.58
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Im Auftrag von Joerg
Hessdoerfer
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. September 2003 12:31
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff:
opensource.
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüssen
>
> Alexander Schulz
>
>
> solutionary GmbH, Reuchlinstrasse 10-11, 10553 Berlin,
> http://www.solutionary.de
> mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tel 030.343462.40 / fax 030.343462.58
> -
Joerg Hessdoerfer kirjutas T, 02.09.2003 kell 13:30:
> Hi!
>
> After holding my breath for quite a while, it bursts out... I'd really like to
> get a status update on said port.
>
> The reason is, it's seemingly put on hold for me. After this port was talked
> over on the list, there seemed to
: Dienstag, 2. September 2003 12:31
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
Hi!
After holding my breath for quite a while, it bursts out... I'd really
like to
get a status update on said port.
The reason is, it's seemingly put on hold for me. After this port was
talked
o
Hi!
After holding my breath for quite a while, it bursts out... I'd really like to
get a status update on said port.
The reason is, it's seemingly put on hold for me. After this port was talked
over on the list, there seemed to be an explosion of effort, with initial
success stories. I did re
Thank you, Bruce for info.
Best regards
Rony
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ronald Kuczek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native
Hi all,
Can someone tell me what happened with Win32 native port ?
Discussion bevore beginning of 7.4, TODO entry this time as "urgent",
but without dash. What does it mean - comes native port with 7.4 or it
doesn't ? Thanks for any information.
Best regards
Rony
---(en
41 matches
Mail list logo
