> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> In 9.1, we will be able to have synchrnous replication. Also we have
>> one standby server chosen by primary to be the synchronous standby
>> (still I'm not sure this is correct or not as stated in another mail).
>>
>
> yes, it is. a list
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> In 9.1, we will be able to have synchrnous replication. Also we have
> one standby server chosen by primary to be the synchronous standby
> (still I'm not sure this is correct or not as stated in another mail).
>
yes, it is. a list of possibl
In 9.1, we will be able to have synchrnous replication. Also we have
one standby server chosen by primary to be the synchronous standby
(still I'm not sure this is correct or not as stated in another mail).
Is there anyway to know which is the synchronous standby? IMO this is
important for users b
