On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote: > In 9.1, we will be able to have synchrnous replication. Also we have > one standby server chosen by primary to be the synchronous standby > (still I'm not sure this is correct or not as stated in another mail). >
yes, it is. a list of possible synch standbys and one of them chosen to be the one > Is there anyway to know which is the synchronous standby? IMO this is > important for users because that one is likely the least behind to > primary and will be chosen to promoto in case of primary dying in most > cases. i guess, we can put a new column in pg_stat_replication stating the type of the replication (synch or asynch). but that is surely a different patch... -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
