Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> Could I suggest that we re-work the TODO list slightly, with regard to
> mentioning the ANSI SQL standard?
>
> As of last count, we have 14 items listed which would take PostgreSQL
> into full SQL:2003 Core conformance. Troels Arvin has recently listed
> some of these as "l
Could I suggest that we re-work the TODO list slightly, with regard to
mentioning the ANSI SQL standard?
As of last count, we have 14 items listed which would take PostgreSQL
into full SQL:2003 Core conformance. Troels Arvin has recently listed
some of these as "low hanging fruit" in the recent t
