Simon Riggs wrote: > > Could I suggest that we re-work the TODO list slightly, with regard to > mentioning the ANSI SQL standard? > > As of last count, we have 14 items listed which would take PostgreSQL > into full SQL:2003 Core conformance. Troels Arvin has recently listed > some of these as "low hanging fruit" in the recent thread about SQL > conformance related patch, > > Some SQL:2003 features are mentioned in other parts of the TODO list, > though we don't refer to whether these are Mandatory or Optional (e.g. > MERGE is Optional). ISTM that it would be useful to group the Mandatory > ones together into a new section of the TODO list: "SQL:2003 Core". > > I'm aware that a number of those are possibly deliberately not > supported, in which case, we could mention those in brackets or simply > leave them off the list etc..
Yes, we could create a new section or add SQL:2003 identifiers as part of the description for certain items. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
