On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
plpgsql raise statement with context
>>> Impasse. Everyone wants this feature in some form, but no consensus on
>>> whether to do this client-side or server-s
Robert Haas writes:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> plpgsql raise statement with context
>> Impasse. Everyone wants this feature in some form, but no consensus on
>> whether to do this client-side or server-side.
> +1 for server-side. Does anyone other than you
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> plpgsql raise statement with context
>
> Impasse. Everyone wants this feature in some form, but no consensus on
> whether to do this client-side or server-side.
+1 for server-side. Does anyone other than you even think that the
client
Hello Heikki,
About two patches I submitted:
pgbench - allow backslash-continuations in custom scripts
Everyone wants the feature, using multi-line SELECTs in pgbench scripts,
but we don't seem to be reaching a consensus on how it should work. I
think we'll need to integrate the lexer, bu
Hello, Heikki.
You wrote:
HL> 21 patches remain in Needs Review state, in the July commitfest. Some of
HL> them have a reviewer signed up. I have highlighted some of them below
HL> that worry me the most. What are we going to do about these? For each of
HL> them, I'd like the authors to have som
2015-07-28 21:51 GMT+02:00 Heikki Linnakangas :
> 21 patches remain in Needs Review state, in the July commitfest. Some of
> them have a reviewer signed up. I have highlighted some of them below that
> worry me the most. What are we going to do about these? For each of them,
> I'd like the authors
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 07/28/2015 11:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Do we want to have this in src/test/modules or src/bin/pg_dump/t?
>> Are we testing pg_dump here, or are we testing extensions? If the
>> former, src/bin/pg_d
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 07/28/2015 11:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Improving test coverage of extensions with pg_dump
>>>
>>>
>>> Do we want to have this in src/test/modules or src/bin/pg_dump/t?
>>
>>
>> Are we testing pg_dump here, or are we testing ex
Hi,
On 07/28/2015 09:51 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
multivariate statistics
This has been a long discussion. Are we getting close to a committable
state?
Certainly not - the discussion may seem long, but it only deals with
some aspects of the patch so far. There was very little discussi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2015 01:22 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
dblink: add polymorphic result functions
>>>
>>> Seems pretty ugly to me to add a dummy argument to functions,
>>> just so that you can specify the result type. The problem it's
>>> trying to solv
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2015-07-28 22:51:55 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> checkpoint continuous flushing
>> This does a big memory allocation at checkpoint, which Tom vehemently
>> objects to.
> Uh. Didn't he just object to failing in that case?
Right. If it can fall back to "stupid"
On 07/28/2015 11:30 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
I've added my name as committer to a few things, but won't be able to work
on them until at least next week when I've finished 9.5 stuff. Happy to
step back if anyone else wants to claim those.
Thanks, every little helps!
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql
On 28 July 2015 at 20:51, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> multivariate statistics
>>
>
> This has been a long discussion. Are we getting close to a committable
> state?
>
This is important, but big.
> COPY RAW
>>
>
> No consensus on whether to add this to the server's COPY command, or as a
> n
On 07/28/2015 11:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
pgbench - allow backslash-continuations in custom scripts
Everyone wants the feature, using multi-line SELECTs in pgbench scripts, but
we don't seem to be reaching a consensus on how it should work. I think
we'll need to i
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> 21 patches remain in Needs Review state, in the July commitfest. Some of
> them have a reviewer signed up. I have highlighted some of them below that
> worry me the most. What are we going to do about these? For each of them,
> I'd like the authors to have some idea on w
On 2015-07-28 22:51:55 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >checkpoint continuous flushing
>
> This does a big memory allocation at checkpoint, which Tom vehemently
> objects to.
Uh. Didn't he just object to failing in that case? IIRC he even
indicated tentative assent, a year or so back, with my
On 07/28/2015 12:51 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Everyone wants the feature, using multi-line SELECTs in pgbench scripts,
> but we don't seem to be reaching a consensus on how it should work. I
> think we'll need to integrate the lexer, but it would be nice to still
> support multi-statements as
21 patches remain in Needs Review state, in the July commitfest. Some of
them have a reviewer signed up. I have highlighted some of them below
that worry me the most. What are we going to do about these? For each of
them, I'd like the authors to have some idea on what they need to do to
get the
18 matches
Mail list logo
