On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>> The part about the planning parameter looks good, thanks. The places
>> used to mention the databases used also makes more sense. Thanks for
>> your input.
>
> OK, committed and back
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Michael Paquier
>> wrote:
I took a look at this with a view to committing it but on examination
I'm not sure this is the best way to proceed
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>>> I took a look at this with a view to committing it but on examination
>>> I'm not sure this is the best way to proceed. The proposed text
>>> documents that the tests should be run
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
>> I took a look at this with a view to committing it but on examination
>> I'm not sure this is the best way to proceed. The proposed text
>> documents that the tests should be run in a database called
>> regression, but the larger document
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Christian Kruse
> wrote:
>>> For the documentation patch, I propose the attached to avoid future
>>> confusions. Comments? It might make sense to back-patch as well.
>>
>> Compiles, didn't find any typos and I
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Christian Kruse
wrote:
>> For the documentation patch, I propose the attached to avoid future
>> confusions. Comments? It might make sense to back-patch as well.
>
> Compiles, didn't find any typos and I think it is comprehensible.
I took a look at this with a vie
Hi,
> For the documentation patch, I propose the attached to avoid future
> confusions. Comments? It might make sense to back-patch as well.
Compiles, didn't find any typos and I think it is comprehensible.
Looks fine for me.
Best regards,
--
Christian Kruse http://www.2ndQuadr
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 17:12 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> IMHO, the regression test suite would gain in consistency and
>> portability if we do not refer to data that is database-dependent.
>
> I once did some similar fixes (e3d9dceef62
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 17:12 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> IMHO, the regression test suite would gain in consistency and
> portability if we do not refer to data that is database-dependent.
I once did some similar fixes (e3d9dceef62e072cf9a433ae6c74a1c5a10d94d3)
but then didn't pursue it any long
> On 2013/12/06, at 3:52, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Robert Haas writes:
>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Michael Paquier writes:
It happens that the following regression tests are failing if they are
run on a database not named "regression":
>
>>> This does not
Robert Haas writes:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Michael Paquier writes:
>>> It happens that the following regression tests are failing if they are
>>> run on a database not named "regression":
>> This does not seem like a bug to me, although maybe we'd better update the
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
>> It happens that the following regression tests are failing if they are
>> run on a database not named "regression":
>
> This does not seem like a bug to me, although maybe we'd better update the
> documentation to specif
Michael Paquier writes:
> It happens that the following regression tests are failing if they are
> run on a database not named "regression":
This does not seem like a bug to me, although maybe we'd better update the
documentation to specify that you need to use a DB named regression.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> Those tests are failing because some relations of information_schemas
> contain information that are database-dependent.
I forgot to mention that it is our QE team at VMware that reported me
a portion of this failure, and I just had to dig a
Hi all,
It happens that the following regression tests are failing if they are
run on a database not named "regression":
- updatable_views
- foreign_data
- sequence
Those tests are failing because some relations of information_schemas
contain information that are database-dependent. Please see the
15 matches
Mail list logo
