On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The part about the planning parameter looks good, thanks. The places >> used to mention the databases used also makes more sense. Thanks for >> your input. > > OK, committed and back-patched to 9.3. Thanks. -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
