Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 16:22, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Two connections are not really a problem IMO, so I would not be in favor
>> of kluging the API to the extent required by solution (B).
> (B) could be as simple as a callback asking for it, though, couldn't
> it? That see
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 16:22, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tatsuo Ishii writes:
>> It seems psql(or libpq) connects to PostgreSQL twice when md5 auth is
>> required. Here is a strace log on my Linux machine. Is there any
>> reason for this? IMO frontend/backend protocol allows to send salt
>> after receiv
Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> It seems psql(or libpq) connects to PostgreSQL twice when md5 auth is
> required. Here is a strace log on my Linux machine. Is there any
> reason for this? IMO frontend/backend protocol allows to send salt
> after receiving AuthenticationMD5Password using the same socket. S
Hi,
It seems psql(or libpq) connects to PostgreSQL twice when md5 auth is
required. Here is a strace log on my Linux machine. Is there any
reason for this? IMO frontend/backend protocol allows to send salt
after receiving AuthenticationMD5Password using the same socket. So
there's no reason to cl
