Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 16:22, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Two connections are not really a problem IMO, so I would not be in favor
>> of kluging the API to the extent required by solution (B).
> (B) could be as simple as a callback asking for it, though, couldn't
> it? That seems a lot simpler (at least in the API) than trying to
> support hanging on to half-connected connections.
What's the point? You'll still need a retry loop around the connection
operation, in case of wrong response or too slow response.
I would also argue that holding a connection open for many seconds
while the user enters a password is not a net conservation of resources
compared to trying again, ie, the premise of Tatsuo-san's complaint is
dubious to begin with.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
