On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
wrote:
> I didn't read previous discussions, but did we have consensus that "number
> of tuples" is better than other units for the parameter? For example,
> "threshold bytes" or "percentage in a page" also seems to be reasonable for
> me.
I thi
On 2010-09-22 04:33, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Jesper Krogh wrote:
Command to set "tuples_per_page" is:
ALTER TABLE set (tuples_per_page = X)
where 1<= X<= 32.
The tuples_per_page means *minimal* number of tuples in a page, right?
A page may contain mo
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> Command to set "tuples_per_page" is:
> ALTER TABLE set (tuples_per_page = X)
> where 1 <= X <= 32.
The tuples_per_page means *minimal* number of tuples in a page, right?
A page may contain more tuples when the size of tuples are small enough
Hi.
This is a follow up and updated patch on several old discussions:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg01065.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2010-04/msg00164.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-06/msg00831.php
First patch:
http://archives.po