On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 00:21 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
> There's a small additional concern, though, which is that there's an
> XPath 2.0 spec out there, and it modifies the type system and data model
> rather heavily. So before we go adding functions, it'd probably be wise
> to check that we're n
Florian Pflug writes:
> There's a small additional concern, though, which is that there's an
> XPath 2.0 spec out there, and it modifies the type system and data model
> rather heavily. So before we go adding functions, it'd probably be wise
> to check that we're not painting ourselves into a corn
On Jul20, 2011, at 23:35 , Tom Lane wrote:
> I find your argument against XPATH_STRING() a bit unconvincing.
> The use case for that is not where you are trying to evaluate an
> unknown, arbitrary XPath expression; it's where you are evaluating an
> expression that you *know* returns string (ie, it
[ having now read the relevant threads a bit more carefully ... ]
Florian Pflug writes:
> On Jul18, 2011, at 22:19 , Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, it's not clear to me either which of those are still reasonable
>> candidates for committing as-is.
> There are actually three XML-related patches from me
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jul 19 12:09:24 -0400 2011:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> If you mean the business about allowing GUCs in postgresql.conf to be
> >> applied even if there are semantic errors elsewhere, I'm just as happy
> >
Robert Haas writes:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you mean the business about allowing GUCs in postgresql.conf to be
>> applied even if there are semantic errors elsewhere, I'm just as happy
>> to let Alexey or Florian have a go at it first, if they want. The real
>> q
On 2011-07-18 21:59, Robert Haas wrote:
There are only two patches left and I think we really ought to try to
take a crack at doing something with them. Yeb is working on the
userspace access vector cache patch, which I think is going drag on
longer than we want keep the CommitFest open, but I'm
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 15:59 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On a pgbench run with 8
> clients on a 32-core machine, I see about a 2% speedup from that patch
> on pgbench -S, and it grows to 8% at 32 clients. At 80 clients (but
> still just a 32-core box), the results bounce around more, but taking
> t
On Jul18, 2011, at 22:19 , Tom Lane wrote:
>> and an
>> error-reporting patch that Tom weighed in on over the weekend. This
>> last suffers from the issue that it's not quite clear whether Tom is
>> going to do the work or whether he's expecting the submitter to do it.
>
> If you mean the busines
On Jul18, 2011, at 22:19 , Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> We're down to three patches that fall into this category: two XML
>> patches by Florian, which have been somewhat derailed by an argument
>> about whether values of type xml should, in fact, be required to be
>> valid xml (I think
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> and an
>> error-reporting patch that Tom weighed in on over the weekend. This
>> last suffers from the issue that it's not quite clear whether Tom is
>> going to do the work or whether he's expecting the submitter to do it.
>
> If you mean the b
Robert,
>> * Collect frequency statistics and selectivity estimation for arrays
>> * Allow multiple Postgres clusters running on the same machine to
>> distinguish themselves in the event log
>> * lazy vxid locks
>
> I'm not clear on your criteria for moving these patches, as they seem
> to be in
Simon,
>> * Cascade Replication
>
> Sorry, too busy reviewing to take note of this. I expect to commit
> when its tested and ready.
So, would that be this commitfest, or next commitfest?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsq
Robert Haas writes:
> We're down to three patches that fall into this category: two XML
> patches by Florian, which have been somewhat derailed by an argument
> about whether values of type xml should, in fact, be required to be
> valid xml (I think you know my vote on this one...);
Yeah, it's no
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> PATCHES WHICH HAVE BEEN UPDATED AND NEED FURTHER REVIEW:
>
> * Cascade Replication
Sorry, too busy reviewing to take note of this. I expect to commit
when its tested and ready.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> As you can probably tell, we are not ready to end the commitfest. (I
> think Robert gave me this CF to show why even talking about a one-week
> mini-fest is a fantasy. If so, successful.).
Heh, heh. Well, it wasn't that premeditated, but I'
On Jul15, 2011, at 23:05 , Josh Berkus wrote:
> * Bugfix for XPATH() if expression returns a scalar value
Well, Peter Eisentraut seemed to disagree with my approach initially,
and seemed to prefer a separate function for XPATH expressions which
return a scalar value.
http://archives.postgresql.
All,
As you can probably tell, we are not ready to end the commitfest. (I
think Robert gave me this CF to show why even talking about a one-week
mini-fest is a fantasy. If so, successful.).
I've booted the patches which obviously aren't going to be immediately
ready. Nine patches are ready for
18 matches
Mail list logo
