On Jul18, 2011, at 22:19 , Tom Lane wrote: >> and an >> error-reporting patch that Tom weighed in on over the weekend. This >> last suffers from the issue that it's not quite clear whether Tom is >> going to do the work or whether he's expecting the submitter to do it. > > If you mean the business about allowing GUCs in postgresql.conf to be > applied even if there are semantic errors elsewhere, I'm just as happy > to let Alexey or Florian have a go at it first, if they want. The real > question at the moment is do we have consensus about changing that? > Because if we do, the submitted patch is certainly not something to > commit as-is, and should be marked Returned With Feedback.
Just to avoid false expectations here: I'd be happy to review further versions of this patch, but I won't write them. best regards, Florian Pflug -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
