Tom Lane wrote:
> I said:
> > The ordering of these shutdown hooks is the reverse of the ordering
> > of the startup initialization of the modules. It looks like we'll
> > need to rejigger the startup ordering ... and it also looks like that's
> > going to be a rather ticklish issue. (See commen
I said:
> The ordering of these shutdown hooks is the reverse of the ordering
> of the startup initialization of the modules. It looks like we'll
> need to rejigger the startup ordering ... and it also looks like that's
> going to be a rather ticklish issue. (See comments in BaseInit and
> InitP
Scott Shattuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry I can't add any insight at this level...but I can say that it
> would be significant to my customer(s) and my ability to recommend PG to
> future "ex-Oracle users" ;) to see a fix make it into the 7.3 final.
Rest assured that it *will* be fixed i
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 09:52, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've identified the reason for the occasional "can't wait without a PROC
> structure" failures we've seen reported. I had been thinking that this
> must occur during backend startup, before MyProc is initialized ...
> but I was mistaken. Actually, i
I've identified the reason for the occasional "can't wait without a PROC
structure" failures we've seen reported. I had been thinking that this
must occur during backend startup, before MyProc is initialized ...
but I was mistaken. Actually, it happens during backend shutdown,
and the reason is
