Tom Lane wrote: > I said: > > The ordering of these shutdown hooks is the reverse of the ordering > > of the startup initialization of the modules. It looks like we'll > > need to rejigger the startup ordering ... and it also looks like that's > > going to be a rather ticklish issue. (See comments in BaseInit and > > InitPostgres.) Any thoughts on how to do it? > > I eventually decided that the most reasonable solution was to leave the > startup sequence alone, and fold the ProcKill and > ShutdownBufferPoolAccess shutdown hooks together. This is a little ugly > but it seems to beat the alternatives. ShutdownBufferPoolAccess was > effectively assuming that LWLockReleaseAll was called just before it, > so the two modules aren't really independent anyway.
I understand. Sometimes the dependencies are too intricate to break apart, and you just reorder them. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
