Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Greg Smith
On 05/24/2011 01:35 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: I would suggest instead adding a new page to postgresql.org/developer which lists the development schedule, rather than linking to that wiki page. Maybe on this page? http://www.postgresql.org/developer/roadmap Now that I look at the roadmap page

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Greg Smith
On 05/24/2011 05:03 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On mån, 2011-05-23 at 22:44 -0400, Greg Smith wrote: -Given that work in August is particularly difficult to line up with common summer schedules around the world, having the other>1 month gap in the schedule go there makes sense. You mi

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On mån, 2011-05-23 at 22:44 -0400, Greg Smith wrote: > -Given that work in August is particularly difficult to line up with > common summer schedules around the world, having the other >1 month > gap in the schedule go there makes sense. You might want to add a comment on the schedule page about

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Josh Berkus
> Actually, you're responding to Greg, not me. Sorry. > But +1 for your suggestions. Any objections before I post something? Greg? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subsc

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Robert, Actually, you're responding to Greg, not me. But +1 for your suggestions. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Josh Berkus
Robert, > -Publish information about the full schedule to some of the more popular > mailing lists I think that posting to pgsql-announce and PostgreSQL.org news, and this list would be sufficient. I'm happy to take care of that. > -Link to this page more obviously from postgresql.org (fixed re

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Greg Smith
David Fetter wrote: I thought we'd agreed on the timing for the first CF, and that I was to announce it in the PostgreSQL Weekly News, so I did just that. Yes, and excellent. The other ideas were: -Publish information about the full schedule to some of the more popular mailing lists -Li

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread David Fetter
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:54:19AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:33 AM, David Fetter wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:44:20PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote: > >> At the developer meeting last week: > >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2011_Developer_Meeting there > >>

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:33 AM, David Fetter wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:44:20PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote: >> At the developer meeting last week: >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2011_Developer_Meeting there >> was an initial schedule for 9.2 hammered out and dutifully >> transcri

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:44:20PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote: > At the developer meeting last week: > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2011_Developer_Meeting there > was an initial schedule for 9.2 hammered out and dutifully > transcribed at > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.2_Devel

[HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-23 Thread Greg Smith
At the developer meeting last week: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2011_Developer_Meeting there was an initial schedule for 9.2 hammered out and dutifully transcribed at http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.2_Development_Plan , and the one part I wasn't sure I had written down