On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:44:20PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote: > At the developer meeting last week: > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2011_Developer_Meeting there > was an initial schedule for 9.2 hammered out and dutifully > transcribed at > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.2_Development_Plan , > and the one part I wasn't sure I had written down correctly I see > Robert already fixed. > > There was a suggestion to add some publicity around the schedule for > this release.
Already started. :) http://www.postgresql.org/community/weeklynews/pwn20110522 > There's useful PR value to making it more obvious to > people that the main development plan is regular and time-based, > even if the release date itself isn't fixed. The right time to make > an initial announcement like that is "soon", particularly if a goal > here is to get more submitted into the first 9.2 CF coming in only a > few weeks. Anyone have changes to suggest before this starts > working its way toward an announcement? I thought we'd agreed on the timing for the first CF, and that I was to announce it in the PostgreSQL Weekly News, so I did just that. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
