Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> Surely that there is an emerging consensus to that effect means that it's
> >> not as unfortunate as it might be? I seem to recall the original
> >> announcement suggesting this was an experiment. I wouldn't expect the
> >> first
> >> couple rounds to go without a hitc
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:39:25PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
perusing a mailbox again. We have unfortunately been badly underprepared
for this.
Surely that there is an emerging consensus to that effect means t
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:39:25PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> perusing a mailbox again. We have unfortunately been badly underprepared
>> for this.
> Surely that there is an emerging consensus to that effect means that it's
> not as unfortunate a
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:39:25PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> perusing a mailbox again. We have unfortunately been badly underprepared
> for this.
Surely that there is an emerging consensus to that effect means that it's
not as unfortunate as it might be? I seem to recall the original
annou
bruce wrote:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
> > "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > You can get the message-ids by grep'ing the mbox file, and the comments
> > > are all:
> > >
> > > http://js-kit.com/rss/momjian.us/msgid-*
> > >
> > > e.g.
> > >
> > > http://js-kit.com/rss/momjian.u
Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You can get the message-ids by grep'ing the mbox file, and the comments
> > are all:
> >
> > http://js-kit.com/rss/momjian.us/msgid-*
> >
> > e.g.
> >
> > http://js-kit.com/rss/momjian.us/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Huh, f
"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You can get the message-ids by grep'ing the mbox file, and the comments
> are all:
>
> http://js-kit.com/rss/momjian.us/msgid-*
>
> e.g.
>
> http://js-kit.com/rss/momjian.us/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Huh, fascinating. it's actually an RSS feed.
I
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > If we modify the archives to have a URL to go straight to a message-id and
> > > Bruce generated a list all on one page including comments and message-ids
> > > then
> > > I could process them all into a wiki page in a few hours.
> >
> > Ideal
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > If we modify the archives to have a URL to go straight to a message-id and
> > Bruce generated a list all on one page including comments and message-ids
> > then
> > I could process them all into a wiki page in a few hours.
>
> Ideally we could have a message id link to
Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I tried this once already. I dumped the first page of Bruce's queue into a
> >> wiki page and laid it out in a column. But I wanted to add links back to
> >> the
> >> messages in the archive and ran into a problem with that
"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I tried this once already. I dumped the first page of Bruce's queue into a
>> wiki page and laid it out in a column. But I wanted to add links back to the
>> messages in the archive and ran into a problem with that. It also would have
>> been a pain b
Tom Lane wrote:
> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Am i looking at the right list though? The one I'm looking at still starts
> > with a patch to which Tom commented "This is superseded by a later
> > submission"
> > which I think has been there since pretty much the start of the comm
Gregory Stark wrote:
>
>
> "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm not sure I follow. I tried last week to give some hours for patch
> >> review. What actually happened was that I had to wade through a ton of
> >> stuff, skipping patches that were
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am i looking at the right list though? The one I'm looking at still starts
> with a patch to which Tom commented "This is superseded by a later submission"
> which I think has been there since pretty much the start of the commitfest.
Yeah, there is still
"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure I follow. I tried last week to give some hours for patch
>> review. What actually happened was that I had to wade through a ton of
>> stuff, skipping patches that were already applied, threads that were
>>
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Also I don't know what patches we have for the next commitfest. I would
gladly give some time to put up a Wiki page to list the patches for the
next commitfest. Would that be helpful?
Yes. My experience is similar to yours. I'm not prepared to spend hours
perusin
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > > I did manage to find actual patches, but I had then to resort to my own
> > > mailbox to get the actual patch to apply and review.
> >
> > You can download an mbox of the entire queue if that helps.
>
> Ah, yeah, that
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Also I don't know what patches we have for the next commitfest. I would
> >> gladly give some time to put up a Wiki page to list the patches for the
> >> next commitfest. Would that be helpful?
>
> > Uh, I don't think we have any p
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I did manage to find actual patches, but I had then to resort to my own
> > mailbox to get the actual patch to apply and review.
>
> You can download an mbox of the entire queue if that helps.
Ah, yeah, that's what I did.
> > Also I don't know w
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Also I don't know what patches we have for the next commitfest. I would
>> gladly give some time to put up a Wiki page to list the patches for the
>> next commitfest. Would that be helpful?
> Uh, I don't think we have any patches for the next commit f
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > This is an interesting observation that deserves to be discussed
> > separately, and relates to the patch queue. Many people want to know
> > what is happening with the patch queue but having better reporting
> > doesn't seem to help much the peo
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> This is an interesting observation that deserves to be discussed
> separately, and relates to the patch queue. Many people want to know
> what is happening with the patch queue but having better reporting
> doesn't seem to help much the people who are actually processing th
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
[ Discussion about making infrastructure downtime more visible to people.]
> > Right now, when email is down, I just start IM'ing people. A more
> > structured system would help me.
>
> Some people would say a more structured approach to patch/bug tracking
> would h
23 matches
Mail list logo
