Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:39:25PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> perusing a mailbox again. We have unfortunately been badly underprepared
>> for this.
> Surely that there is an emerging consensus to that effect means that it's
> not as unfortunate as it might be? I seem to recall the original
> announcement suggesting this was an experiment. I wouldn't expect the first
> couple rounds to go without a hitch; as long as there is procedural
> improvement the next time, that's a good thing, right?
Yeah, we expected to have glitches. I think we now have a much better
idea what sort of status-tracking support we need for future fests.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
