Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom,
>
> > Right at the moment my feeling is that there are issues here that are
> > considerably more subtle than we realized, and rather than risk creating
> > unforeseen problems, we ought to bounce the whole issue back to the TODO
> > list for 8.1.
>
> Agreed. I will sub
Tom,
> Right at the moment my feeling is that there are issues here that are
> considerably more subtle than we realized, and rather than risk creating
> unforeseen problems, we ought to bounce the whole issue back to the TODO
> list for 8.1.
Agreed. I will submit a new patch that simply adds a
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> By removing comments from postgresql.conf, I am afraid we are making all
> environment value useless.
Good point.
> I suppose the easiest fix would be to re-command the postgresql.conf
> values that can be over-ridden with environment variables, or make
I had a problem with this patch. By removing the comment from 'port',
the postgresql.conf 'port' value is used in the regression tests rather
than the environment value. I see in guc.c
env = getenv("PGPORT");
if (env != NULL)
SetConfigOption("port", env, PGC_POSTMASTER, PGC_S_EN
