On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 08:25:31AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> > The point is we can
> > remove the module when someone fixes and replaces the functionality that's
> > left in there that some people rely on. So far nobody has stepped up to the
> > plate, although now that we have lateral a
On 24 February 2013 13:46, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> done
>
The patch included the word 'so' in the email address by accident.
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 08:25 +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> 2013/2/22 Andrew Dunstan :
> >
> > On 02/21/2013 12:56 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Robert Haas
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick
> >>> wrote:
> >
2013/2/22 Andrew Dunstan :
>
> On 02/21/2013 12:56 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Robert Haas
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick
>>> wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a documentation or hackers issue, but the
doc
On 02/21/2013 12:56 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick
wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a documentation or hackers issue, but the
documentation page for contrib module "xml2" refers to PostgreSQL
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick
> wrote:
>> I'm not sure if this is a documentation or hackers issue, but the
>> documentation page for contrib module "xml2" refers to PostgreSQL 8.4 in the
>> future tense:
>>
>>"It
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick
wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is a documentation or hackers issue, but the
> documentation page for contrib module "xml2" refers to PostgreSQL 8.4 in the
> future tense:
>
>"It is planned that this module will be removed in PostgreSQL 8.4
