On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 08:25 +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: > 2013/2/22 Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net>: > > > > On 02/21/2013 12:56 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick > >>> <barw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I'm not sure if this is a documentation or hackers issue, but the > >>>> documentation page for contrib module "xml2" refers to PostgreSQL 8.4 in > >>>> the > >>>> future tense: > >>>> > >>>> "It is planned that this module will be removed in PostgreSQL 8.4 in > >>>> favor of the newer standard API" > >>>> > >>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/xml2.html > >>>> > >>>> Are there any plans to remove this module by a forseeable date? > >>> > >>> Nope. I have repeatedly been voted down on removing it, and I've also > >>> been repeatedly voted down on removing the deprecation text. Could we > >>> at least agree on changing the deprecation text to say "This module is > >>> deprecated and may be removed in a future release"? > >> > >> Not reopening the actual discussion about rmeoving it, but assuming > >> we're not, strong +1 on changing the deprecation message. And don't > >> forget to backpatch the change so it shows up in the old versions of > >> the docs as well. > >> > > > > > > Yes, we should change it to remove the reference to 8.4. > > Documentation patch attached.
done -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
