Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> relation_expr is fine by me. It just makes the syntax more complicated
> to explain ...
> Btw., so we plan to keep the sql_inheritance parameter forever?
I have no idea ... but I should think we'd want to allow ONLY here in
any case. You can use t
Tom Lane wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Eisentraut) writes:
Log Message:
---
TABLE command
If this got re-posted for review I missed it :-(. I disagree with using
qualified_name here --- I think it would be better to use relation_expr
so that people would have the ability to specify
