Tom Lane wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Eisentraut) writes:
Log Message:
-----------
TABLE command
If this got re-posted for review I missed it :-(. I disagree with using
qualified_name here --- I think it would be better to use relation_expr
so that people would have the ability to specify inheritance behavior.
If you want to point to the spec and say that that syntax isn't in the
spec, that's true, but then you need to justify the inhOpt setting
you're forcing people to use. It's not entirely clear what behavior the
spec intends, but I'm pretty sure INH_DEFAULT isn't it.
relation_expr is fine by me. It just makes the syntax more complicated
to explain ...
Btw., so we plan to keep the sql_inheritance parameter forever?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
