On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Sorry for having lost track of this. I think if we're going to do this,
>> we should do it now not later, because it essentially reverts the
>> connectDatabase() API change made in 83dec5a71 in favor of a different API
Tom Lane wrote:
> Sorry for having lost track of this. I think if we're going to do this,
> we should do it now not later, because it essentially reverts the
> connectDatabase() API change made in 83dec5a71 in favor of a different API
> change with the same purpose. Now, that doesn't matter if n
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Haribabu Kommi
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Michael Paquier
>> wrote:
>>> That's neater. See for example the attached.
>> Yes, it is much cleaner than the previous version.
>> I reviewed and tested the same. It is work
