Tom Lane wrote: > Sorry for having lost track of this. I think if we're going to do this, > we should do it now not later, because it essentially reverts the > connectDatabase() API change made in 83dec5a71 in favor of a different API > change with the same purpose. Now, that doesn't matter if no third-party > code is using connectDatabase(), but I have a suspicion that there > probably is some. Any such users will not thank us for whacking > connectDatabase's API around in 9.5 and then whacking it around > differently in 9.6. > > In short, I think we should apply this now and back-patch into 9.5, > like the prior patch, even though we're post-RC1. The reduction in > cross-version API churn is worth it. > > If no objections, I'll go do that shortly.
No objection here. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
