Hi all, been awhile! Some may be saying "not long enough" but eh.
I recently moved a mybb forum away from mysql to postgres. Along the way
I encountered a couple of things that either didn't seem to be supported
or I'm just not doing it right.
First, the server this is on is running versio
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> If there were a comp.databases.postgresql.hackers newsgroup created and
> carried by all the news servers ... would you move to using it vs using
> the mailing lists?
Trying this again with the right From address...
No. (and yes, I'm still here :
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> If there were a comp.databases.postgresql.hackers newsgroup created and
> carried by all the news servers ... would you move to using it vs using
> the mailing lists?
No. (yes, I'm still here :)
Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k an
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On 2 Sep 2003 at 15:50, Czuczy Gergely wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > i'm using pgsql 7.3.4.
> > how can I fix it? i think so, i should modify the header files, i've tried
> > to put it into an ``extern "C" {...}'' block, but i
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> The PostgreSQL Core would like to publicly welcome welcome Josh Berkus as
> our newest member.
>
> Josh is being included especially as a "liason" between the
> source-programmer and non-source-programmer contributors to PostgreSQL, in
> an effort t
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> for the web, yes ... the new site doesn't support mirroring, as its highly
> database driven ... only thing still mirrorable, really, is the ftp
> server ...
I knew that was gonna happen.
Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and bey
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> *Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through >300 messages
> nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and
> 290 are trash ...
>
> What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned?
Avo
FYI.
Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 04:08:3
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Justin Clift wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >
> >>My feeling too. Whatever you may think of its usefulness, it's been a
> >>documented feature since 7.1. It's a bit late to reconsider.
> >
> > It's never too late for new users to reconsider. It's al
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > My feeling too. Whatever you may think of its usefulness, it's been a
> > documented feature since 7.1. It's a bit late to reconsider.
>
> It's never too late for new users to reconsider. It's also never too late
> to change
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, mlw wrote:
> I am not familiar with ILIKE, but I suspect that if people are moving
> from a platfrom on which it exists, or even creatingmulti-platform
> applications, there may be a substancial amount of code that may use it.
I don't know about other platforms but I've been
On 14 Feb 2003, Martin Coxall wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 14:21, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On 14 Feb 2003, Martin Coxall wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > > If you are interested in reading a contrary position, you can read
> > > > > Berstein'
On 14 Feb 2003, Martin Coxall wrote:
>
> > > If you are interested in reading a contrary position, you can read
> > > Berstein's arguments for his recommended way to install services at:
> > > http://cr.yp.to/unix.html
>
> But since DJB is a class-A monomaniac, he may not be the best person to
> l
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Thursday 13 February 2003 18:07, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > Actually FHS says the opposite. If the distribution installs PostgreSQL
> > then the config files belong in /etc/postgresql. If the admin does then
> > they bel
On 13 Feb 2003, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> What your comments strongly suggest to me is that projects like
> PostgreSQL and pine, along with everything else, should comply with FHS;
> then there will be no confusion because everyone will be following the
> smae standards. Messes arise when people ig
On 13 Feb 2003, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 18:45, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 17:52, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > > > Seems to me that if FHS allows such a mess, it's reason enough to avoid
> &
On 13 Feb 2003, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 12:00, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > > Which means if the the vendor installed Postgresql (say, the
> > > Red Hat Database) you'd expect config files to be in /etc.
> > > If the postgresql is compiled fr
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, J. M. Brenner wrote:
>
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Okay, here's one: most Unix systems store all of the configuration
> > > files in a well known directory: /etc. These days it's a hierarchy of
> > > directories with /etc as the root of the
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Laurette Cisneros wrote:
>
> Well this isn't any good...the primary site is hugely busy and it is not on
> any of the mirrors. Perhaps it did not get copied over to the mirrors even
> though this announcent says it is there?
ftp.us.postgresql.org has had it for a day or two n
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> Well the results are finally in. Hopefully we can concentrate on putting
> them right, rather than having a round of "told you so's" :-)
>
> I modified the test program slightly to improve the consistency checks.
> The updated version is attached.
[...]
>
>
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, mlw wrote:
> Like it or not, if PG releases a very good Win32 port, ALL the unixoids
> combined will be out numbered by the windoze users.
Now that's certainly something to look forward to.
Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 30 January 2003 19:20
> > To: Lamar Owen
> > Cc: Tom Lane; Dave Page; Ron Mayer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re:
Dave, Lamar and Katie can cheer now 'cuze this is the last comment
I'm going to make on this. All others will be ignored, probably.
The one thing I haven't seen from Dave, Lamar or Katie on this is
reputation. You're all for the PostgreSQL name going on it but I
have yet to see any of you so su
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Thursday 30 January 2003 13:17, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > > Vince, I would say that we, the developers of PostgreSQL, are then not
> > > qualified to test our own releases for the
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> Vince, I would say that we, the developers of PostgreSQL, are then not
> qualified to test our own releases for the reasons you mentioned that Katie
> should not test her own releases. Of course that's ridiculous -- often the
> developers can do a better
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Ron Mayer wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Cool irony in the automated .sig on the mailinglist software...
> > >
> > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > > > ...
> >
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Ron Mayer wrote:
>
> Cool irony in the automated .sig on the mailinglist software...
>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > ...
> > hammering the betas is a far cry from an "industrial-strength solution".
> > ...
&
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, James Hubbard wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>The code's been available for what a week or two? Do you
> >>>actually think that can be considered conclusive by any
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 29 January 2003 17:10
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: Katie Ward; Tom Lane; Curtis Faith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Katie Ward wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Katie Ward wrote:
> >
> > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > hammering the betas is a far cry from an "industrial-strength
> > > > > > solution".
> > > > >
> > > > > Have you a better suggestion? Seems a bit
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> > The code's been available for what a week or two? Do you
> > actually think that can be considered conclusive by any standard?
>
> Public beta testing (but closed source) has been going on for some
> months.
So you've been running these unscientific test
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> I would be interested to know how many windows servers those that are
> against a windows port of PostgreSQL have or do manage, and how
> experienced they are with that platform...
At this point I'm not for or against. But you're going to have to do
more t
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Katie Ward wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vince Vielhaber
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:45 AM
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: Katie Ward; Tom Lane; Curtis
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> > hammering the betas is a far cry from an "industrial-strength
> > solution".
>
> Have you a better suggestion? Seems a bit catch 22 if testing won't
> prove it's good and we can't use it until we know it's good... Still,
> industrial strength testing or no
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 29 January 2003 16:27
> > To: Katie Ward
> > Cc: Tom Lane; Curtis Faith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Katie Ward wrote:
> >
> > In all honesty, I do not *want* Windows people to think that they're not
> > running on the "poor stepchild" platform.If we go down that path,
> > they'll start trying to run production databases on Windows, and then
> > we'll get blamed for the
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> > >
> > > Total Hits 1339547
> > > Total Files 1064536
> > > Total Pages 324346
> > > Total Visits 58178
> > > Total KBytes 2712883
> > >
> > > In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure I'd call tha
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ross J. Reedstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 13 January 2003 15:16
> > To: Vince Vielhaber
> > Cc: Dan Langille; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [H
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:01:38AM -0500, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > > On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EM
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > > FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
> > > > WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what t
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
> > WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
>
> Sorry to be dense, but what time period is this for?
Any given day. It's disk space, not traffic.
> > On www/ftp.us I don't even notice
On 7 Jan 2003, Greg Copeland wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 16:46, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote:
> >
> > > This is a serious inquiry, very serious. People are complaining about ads.
> > >
> > > What do we need in the form of
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote:
> This is a serious inquiry, very serious. People are complaining about ads.
>
> What do we need in the form of equipment, bandwidth, etc.
FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
On www/ftp.us I don't e
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > > Marc G. Fournier writes:
> > >
> > > > I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> > I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out
> > and let us know if there are any problems ... DNS is going to take a
> > little while to propogate, so the old site may still come up in the
>
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have not been aggressive about backpatching documentation improvements
> into 7.3.1. Is that something I should check?
>
> As I remember, we didn't update the official docs for minor releases.
> Is that still true?
They say hydergine helps the memory
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> --- for example: Marc owns, runs, and pays for the
> >> postgresql.org servers.
>
> > Is the cvs repo mirrored?
>
> Anyone running cvsup would have a complete copy of the source CVS,
> I believe. It would be mo
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Josh Berkus wrote:
> But once Postgres has been packaged, we need to have a group making a
> loud enough noise to get the world to pay attention. I'm not asking
> everyone on this list to participate, but I am asking everyone on this
> list to recognize the utility of the eff
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Saturday 07 December 2002 11:10 pm, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On 5 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 03:28, Dave Page wrote:
> > > > www is a closed group consisting of a few of us who actually do
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> >
> > That's what I thought. You have no argument so your just typing.
>
> Hi Vince,
>
> Was more hoping you'd care to share your basis for stating Robert's
> employers clients wante
On 8 Dec 2002, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 22:27, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On 8 Dec 2002, Oliver Elphick wrote:
>
> > > If something is familiar, it feels safe. We need to make PostgreSQL
> > > familiar. That's why we need marketing.
> &
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> >>
> >>>Because of this taken from the above quoted text:
> >>>
> >>&g
On 8 Dec 2002, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 20:52, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > > Why do you say that?
> >
> > Because of this taken from the above quoted text:
> >
> > "they were under constant assault from their clients to use oracle or
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > Because of this taken from the above quoted text:
> >
> > "they were under constant assault from their clients to use oracle or db2"
> >
> > Last I looked neither Oracle or DB2 were op
On 7 Dec 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
>
> > What too many people fail to realize is that in a commercial environment
> > many companies want another company to point the finger at in case of
> > disaster. Sybase failed, or HP failed, or IBM failed, or Microsoft
> > failed. They feel they can do somet
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Well, my previous employer uses postgresql, but they were under constant
> >>assault from their clients to use oracle or db2. Techni
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Dave,
>
> > >
> > > BTW, we do coordinate with the Website development group
> >
> > When did that happen then? I think I must have blinked :-)
>
> Marc and Justin are periodically keeping the Advocacy group informed
> of progress on wwwdevel, and we were
On 5 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 03:28, Dave Page wrote:
> > www is a closed group consisting of a few of us who actually do the work
> > on the sites.
>
> This is one of the primary reasons the sites are so fractured. We have 4
> different mailing lists for website devel
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Brian Knox wrote:
> Speaking from the perspective of a long time postgresql user, who
> currently has several very mission critical applications using postgresql
> on the back end, at a very large company...
>
> I can say the one consequence of the problem that I have run into
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
> Well, my previous employer uses postgresql, but they were under constant
> assault from their clients to use oracle or db2. Technically there was no
> reason to switch, but if your choice is switch databases or go out of
> business, there really isn't muc
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Marc G. Fournier writes:
> >
> > > It isn't, but those working on -advocacy were asked to help come up with a
> > > stronger release *announcement* then we've had in the past ...
> >
> > Consider that a failed experiment. Post
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> >
> > > That wasn't stronger, it was fluffier. It was full of buzzwords that
> > > were masking the actual content. Are you trying to hid
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > I'll preempt the 'this was all discussed on -advocacy, you should have
> > been there' response with yet another agreement with Vince :-) - I too
> > am getting far too much mail these days and another list is
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > Justin Clift writes:
> >
> > > Of course we are, it's just that we're also trying to direct people to
> > > the Advocacy site where there is a lot more info, in a lot more languages.
> >
> > Why don't w
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > Marc G. Fournier writes:
> >
> > > Yup, as with doing anything for the firs ttime, the press release itself
> > > had its 'bugs' ... considering how many times Josh asked for comments on
> > > it, I'm s
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > > Yup, as with doing anything for the firs ttime, the press release itself
> > > had its 'bugs' ... considering how many times Josh asked for comments on
> > >
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > I could have sworn we used to have a bunch of ftp mirrors for downloads.
> > Come to think of it I rewrote/stole a load of Vince's PHP code to allow
> > you to select one from the portal recently. Are we not u
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 03 December 2002 19:12
> > To: Bruce Momjian
> > Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global
> > Development Group Announces
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
>
> > > Excellent. Are there any other people involved in PostgreSQL and
> > > universities or educational institutions? If so we could put something
> > > together about experiences for the advocacy Web site.
>
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120
> > > column wide, 38
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 23:32, Justin Clift wrote:
> > > Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes it would. But while on the subject, why did you only mention it's
> > > >
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120
> > > column wide, 38 row xterm. There wa
xury of a large
screen 'cuze I'm reading from a remote site with horrible resolution or
just an 80x25 screen.
>
> -------
>
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote
On 29 Nov 2002, Ryan Mahoney wrote:
> Scroll down and read the rest of, it's an excellent announcement! If
> the website and mirrors made mention of the release (as of 8:19PM CST
> they don't!) and the message was sent to all the mailing lists, there
> would probably be less confusion. When I re
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Glad you liked it. But that doesn't change the fact that it obscured the
> > release to the point that many people didn't even know it was released.
> > I found out by folks complaining about broken links.
>
> Hrm - the subject said it all,
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that
> > > copy of the message never arrived here (it did show up on pgsql-general
> > > though). Evidently you and Vince never got it either ...
> >
> > After alot of searc
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Has there been a release? It certainly hasn't been announced in the usual
> > places that I monitor.
>
> Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that
> copy of the message never arriv
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> Just a quick note to mention that I've resigned from the PostgreSQL
> steering committee. It has been a lot of fun and very rewarding to
> participate in PostgreSQL development over the last six years, but it is
> time to take a break and to move on to
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Are we ready for RC1 yet?
This is Tuesday, you can only ask on Fridays :)
Vince.
--
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.
---(e
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> to be honest ... I forgot it was there too :(
Just means I'm gonna have to do a bunch of popup ads!
** ducking and running
>
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wro
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Gee. I didn't know that existed. We are probably better off doing it
> > > via mailing list so we can discuss the resul
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Gee. I didn't know that existed. We are probably better off doing it
> via mailing list so we can discuss the results.
What do you mean you didn't know it existed? It's been there for the
last few releases (since 7.1). You've even submitted to it!
tyle.
Vince.
--
======
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts
Right?
Don't see what you're complaining about. I get teh 7.2.1 admin guide.
Vince.
--
======
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00
above url will show the notes and what they're in relation to with
a link to that particular piece of documentation.
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Natio
r site and think they're 100% accurate. Nothing is
final until it's announced on the announce mailing list and/or
the main website.
Vince.
--
======
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.p
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
>
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Oleg,
> > >
> > > It's supposed to show roughly where everyone is.
> > >
> > >
ivities in Congress (re. internet broadcasting), so
I want to get the new one up asap and before things bust loose again.
Vince.
--
======
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
5
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:59:33AM -0400, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > It occurs to me that opening web page on www.postgresql.org, aski
en there, done that, didn't work. Too much of a job to keep track of
that many IP blocks too.
Vince.
--
======
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup f
, then let's go with a Sunday night packaging, Monday announce, so that
> we have beta2 testing starting right at the beginning of the week ...
>
>
>
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (s
ro success in getting that tcl tool to work
which is the current holdup but I do have all the updates I know of
that are needed.
Vince.
--
======
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I haven't see the beta announcement on the announce list. Do we
> announce it there?
I've been expecting it but haven't seen it yet.
Vince.
--
======
Vinc
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > >
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I will work on that this month. It is part of the advocacy project.
> >
> > Since when?
>
> Since I decide to take ov
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > > %ls -lt ~ftp/pub/source/v7.3beta
> >
> > Is this where you're putting it this time? Last time was ~ftp
l lists at once with the unregister command
> > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >
>
>
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
s I get this tcl tool working.
Vince.
--
======
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
http://www.camp
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> %ls -lt ~ftp/pub/source/v7.3beta
Is this where you're putting it this time? Last time was ~ftp/pub/beta.
Vince.
--
======
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL P
1 - 100 of 344 matches
Mail list logo
