entees should be opaque
to the community so as to prevent distraction. There should be no
appearance of community endorsement of such programs.
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
ach to
community for assistance. In addition, third party organizations should
maintain a healthy disconnection from the community.
Is this correct?
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
up to do it has some intrinsic
> motivation.
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/15/books/chapters/0515-1st-levitt.html
>
Interesting.
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
er (student). The mentors are part of the educational process.
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
rning a
new skill. And hopefully, such a person might continue to offer support for
the project after the initial experience.
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
this effect already taken place among the volunteering patch writers?
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
ding the
reviewer. The utlimate goal is to add more people to the ranks of
reviewers.
> Are the mentors restricted to being US members?
>
The mentors can be anyone. If the possibility exists that PgUS can fund
mentors, then prospective mentors will need to be or become members of
PgUS.
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
n a way that will meet the
requirements of the 501c.
It needs to be a learning experience and there needs to be a well defined
criteria of what will be delivered by the person awarded with the grant.
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
prospective
mentors the ablility to spend more time with mentee's.
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
alleviate your
concern?
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 1/24/11 12:17 PM, Richard Broersma wrote:
> > PgUS is preparing to fund a grant for PgUS members to learn and
> > participate in the patch review process. We looking for experienced
> > reviewers that can assist a
posted to Hackers.
Would anyone be available to assist with this?
Thoughts?
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Marko Tiikkaja
wrote:
> I'd prefer something short but easily understandable, but those two might be
> mutually exclusive.
Volatile CTE's doesn't add any more clarity either. Maybe "Round Trip
Reduction" CTE's. :)
--
Regards
CONSTRAINT TRIGGER documentation that says the trigger
function must explicitly raise an exception to create the notification
that the custom constraint was violated.
Would this be a good place for it?
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.p
7;t know, maybe this is already possible.
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
15 matches
Mail list logo