Olivier PRENANT wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
I am inclined to think yes. It would prevent uglification of the code
by not having to special-case Unixware.
However, I was able to read the libc sources to confirm thread-safety.
Because you can not see the source, would you try a threaded
Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:35:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:20:14 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Lee Kindness writes:
>>
>> > You don't..
m right to me that pg_dumpall
replace template1 but maybe I'm wrong on this one.
Thanks for your tim and help
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
Quartier d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE
n't event check for ant and so on.
So far, I've tried with sh, ksh and bash to no avail.
Just can't uindertsand. What am I doing wrong??
the paths are ok and I succeeded a few weeks ago ... What could cause?
TIA
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33-5-61-50-97-00 (W
u searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
Quartier d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE
, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 11:34:01 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problems with 7.3.1
>
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
&
OTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problems with 7.3.1
>
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I tried postgresql 7.3 and 7.3.1 and they both fail regressin when
> > creating plpgs
wrote:
> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 13:44:51 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problems with 7.3.1
>
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Compi
Dear Tom
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 13:44:51 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problems with 7.3.1
>
> Olivier P
troot[pg_proc_proname_nsp_index]: fixing root page
ERROR: bt_fixroot: not valid old root page.
What could be causing that (I've tested on uw 711 with no problem)
Many thanks in advance
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
Quartier d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97
Many thanks Larry,
Sorry I had omited the -Xb (no secret dance) in my report...
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 15:17:28 -0600
> From: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Olivier PRENANT <[EMA
ebugging and optimization mutually exclusive; -O disabled
>
> It still passes here. I really wonder if they fixed something in the 4.1
> compiler. IIRC
> the 7.1.1b compiler is 4.0.
>
> Truly wierd.
>
> LER
>
>
> --On Thursday, November 07, 2002 17:40:24 +0100
ut to double check it on 7.1.3.
>
> Olivier, is this the 7.1.1b FS Compiler?
>
> I wonder if a bug fix made it in...
>
> Wierd.
>
>
>
> --On Thursday, November 07, 2002 17:34:49 +0100 Olivier PRENANT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I see the la
IL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
>
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
ECTED]
> >> Cc: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and
> >> a
> >>
> >> Olivi
]
> Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
>
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Huh! I just tried to compile 7.3b5 without CFLAGS=-Xb, it still bugs the
> > compiler...
>
> It won't get better if you don't sh
compiler...
> >>
> Didn't for me :-(
>
> Wierd.
BTW, this is on 7.1.1 not (yet) on 8.0.0
I'll let you know hopefully today.
(How did you get 713 when it's due for december?) Can I have a copy?
>
>
> >
> > --
> > Olivier
PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
>
>
>
> --On Thursday, November 07, 2002 13:32:18 +0100 Olivier PRENANT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That's true!
> >
> > But I had to export CFLAGS=-Xb to compile (this should be in port Makefile
&
;
> To: Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
> patch.
>
> We already have success messages from Olivier Prenant for 7.3B4 on 8.0.0,
> and me for 7.1.3
L PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.3b3 ok on unixware 71[12] here
>
> On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 12:16, Olivier PRENANT wrote:
> > On 30 Oct 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >
> > > Date: 30 Oct 2002 12:14:01 -0600
> > > From: Larry Rosenm
On 30 Oct 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Date: 30 Oct 2002 12:14:01 -0600
> From: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.3b3 ok on unixware 71[12] here
>
> On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 12:08, Olivier PRE
a clue of what to
do. It DID work on pg 723 though...
Regards,
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
Quartier d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Ema
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:35:33 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Please help
>
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It seems that conne
rom: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Please help
>
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Without modifying anything, postgresql (since today) has a strange
>
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:52:10 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Please help
>
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROT
To: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PL/Perl?
>
> On Wed, 2002-09-04 at 19:41, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-09-04 at 17:54, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Larry Rosenman &
Lane wrote:
> Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 17:14:13 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in Makefile.shlib
>
> Oliv
-0500
> From: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in Makefile.shlib
>
> On Wed, 2002-09-04 at 12:28, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Olivier P
ROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in Makefile.shlib
>
> On Wed, 2002-09-04 at 12:28, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I think I figured why I can't buil plperl on unixware 711/OpenUnix 800.
> >
> > > It see
S] Bug in Makefile.shlib
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Olivier PRENANT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: September 04, 2002 12:18 PM
>
> > I think I figured why I can't buil plperl on unixware 711/OpenUnix 800.
> >
> > It seems Makefile.shl
Hi,
I think I figured why I can't buil plperl on unixware 711/OpenUnix 800.
It seems Makefile.shlib has changed between 722 and 73 and -z text has
been added. However with this on, it fails to build libperl.so
Maybe I'm wrong, but could someone consider this patch.
Regards,
-
Sorry to bother, but it seems my last to messages (one to the news and
one yesterday to the pghackers list) did'nt go through..
The problem related to difficulties with plperl and 7.3 on UW 711
Regards
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
Quartier d&#x
for your explanation.
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 17:17:58 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL FILES
>
> Oli
Hi every one.
I just moved (at last!) to 7.2.1. Works like a charm...
I'm suprised though by the number of WAL files.
I have 8 files where postgresql.conf says WAL_FILES=4.
What did I miss ? (I have no outstanding transaction)
FWIW, t's on UW711.
Regards,
--
Olivi
> the same time zone then your application should probably not notice an
> effect.
>
>- Thomas
>
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
Quartier d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE
hat I should go for timestamp without timezone instead,
witch is okay because all timezones are the same. However, what happens
with daylight saving calculations. Is it still take into account??
Many thaks for that great product!
Regards
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33-5-61
On Sat, 12 May 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Shoudn't postgres extend priviledges to the sequences generated by a
> > create table ???
>
> That's not clear. The sequence is an independent object. Had you
> ex
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your quick reply. However, I knew (and did that). My post were
more ... philosophical:
Shoudn't postgres extend priviledges to the sequences generated by a
create table ???
Regards,
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Hi,
I've just noticed that (after a upgrade from 7.0.3 to 7.1) the following
did'nt work anymore:
create tabla a (n1 serial, n2 int);
grant all on a to nobody;
insert into a (n2) value (1);
n1.nextval: you don't have permission to set sequence n1
It worked on 7.0.3
Regard
this:
>
> int ulen = VARSIZE(user)-VARHDRSZ;
> char utmp[ulen+]; // This works in newer GCC, cool.
> memcpy(utmp,VARDATA(user), len);
> utmp[ulen]=0;
> crypted=crypt(utmp,salt);
>
> Strings are not gurenteed to be NULL teminated.
>
>
> Olivier PRENANT wrote:
RETURNS text AS '/encrypt.so';
WHY on earth does
SELECT post_crypt('test'),sql_crypt('test','PY')
NOT GIVE the same result???
Please help,
This is most urgent (My customer can't use this function anymore); it
worked OK with 7.0.3!!
Regards,
l could'nt generate correctly
CREATE FUNCTION when function has been created using the form
CREATE FUNCTION foo(x) RETURNS type AS '/foo.so','foo2' LANGUAGE C;
pg_dumps "forgets" the 'foo2' part: that being a pain in the a... when
reloading...
Regards
ted in or if there is someplace I
> can submit these to, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Matthew
>
>
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
Olivier PRENANT
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not
> > used.
>
> That's difficult to believe, because int8.c doesn't include anything
> that even k
Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not
used.
weird!!
Regards,
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Olivier PRENANT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Testing beta5 on unixware7 gives an error on int8 test while beta4 (I've
> just retested it) works ok regressions.diff f
--+---
! 4567890123456789 | -4567890123456789
123 | 456
! (2 rows)
-- This should fail, because q2 isn't a name of an EXCEPT output column
SELECT q1 FROM int8_tbl EXCEPT SELECT q2 FROM int8_tbl ORDER BY q2 LIMIT 1;
--- 367,375
S
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> * Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010227 13:30]:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been trying to play with beta5 today on unixware 711. I have 2
> > problems:
> >
> > 1) enabling --with-tcl yields t
ation error on
src/backend/libpq/crypt.c because of multiply defined symbol des_encrypt
Regards,
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
Quartier d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (G
e you thinking of??
>
> Lack of large object support for new TOAST columns is going to be a big
> 7.1 complaint. I was thinking of using the same functions as our large
> object stuff, but remove the OID requirement.
>
>
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33
Hi,
Beeing very impressed by TOAST, I wonder how I can insert BLOB from a flat
file.
It seems quite easy with php; But how can I do it from psql??
TIA
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
Quartier d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
seems quite easy with php; But how can I do it from psql??
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > --
> > Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
> > Quartier d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
> &
As I said previously.. I apologies, this was all my fault.
Please discard...
Oh my, When will we have an RC???
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> * Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010110 12:47]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just recompiled 7.1 beta from cu
Sorry to folowup on my own post
Problem solved: real and test db don't run on the same machine.
On the test one, postgres had the same uid as pg_shadow.usesysid for the
user...
Sorry to have bothered you all.
Reagrds
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Olivier PRENANT wrote:
> Hi,
>
s me think it's a psql bug is that select * from pg_databases
show 1 template0 and 1 template1.
For what it's worth, it on unixware 711.
BTW, when is the release due for? I'm VERY impatient. This is the best
I've seen.
Regards,,
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33
Hi,
Is there a problem? I haven't received anything today...
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
Quartier d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Ema
55 matches
Mail list logo
