Re: [HACKERS] Debian readline/libedit breakage

2011-02-14 Thread Martin Pitt
n, and personally I'd rather move back to libreadline until OpenSSL or readline or PostgreSQL threatens Debian with a legal case for license violation (I daresay that the chances of this happening are very close to zero..). But oh well.. Thanks, and sorry for all the madness this created! M

Re: [HACKERS] Versioned mo file installation

2008-12-05 Thread Martin Pitt
gt; think we should keep it as libpq-8.3, like the rest. Doesn't make much of a difference indeed, I just made it match the package name. Also, libpq5 built from -8.3 is used with postgresql-8.2 as well. Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu D

[HACKERS] pg_dump: add option to ignore TABLE DATA for failed TABLE object creation

2006-07-17 Thread Martin Pitt
org/~mpitt/test-pg_restore-existing.sh -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? diff -ruN postgresql-8.1.3-old/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_restore.sgml p

Re: [HACKERS] Please help, pgAdmin3 on Debian!

2006-03-28 Thread Martin Pitt
b user as well (so that connecting from remote computer over TCP works as well). If you really need to connect as user postgres to do administrative tasks, then the easiest solution is to set a password for the user postgres, as already mentioned in the previous reply. HTH, Martin -- Martin Pitt

Re: [HACKERS] Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, patch take #3

2006-03-03 Thread Martin Pitt
eady exists). [...] Tom Lane [2006-02-25 12:18 -0500]: > Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin Pitt [2006-02-19 14:39 +0100]: > >> Since this changes the behaviour of pg_restore, this should probably > >> become an option, e. g. -D / --ignore-exist

Re: [HACKERS] Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1

2006-02-25 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi again, Martin Pitt [2006-02-19 14:39 +0100]: > Since this changes the behaviour of pg_restore, this should probably > become an option, e. g. -D / --ignore-existing-table-data. I'll do > this if you agree to the principle of the current patch. I improved the patch now to onl

Re: [HACKERS] pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....

2006-02-23 Thread Martin Pitt
cluster with --cluster version/name, that worked pretty well so far). Sounds interesting, though. :) (Again, let's discuss that in the Debian BTS). Thanks for the suggestions, Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.

Re: [HACKERS] pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....

2006-02-23 Thread Martin Pitt
upstream inclusion (which is fine; it's the distributor's task to integrate an application into a distribution's file layout/configuration handling/other quirks). Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Develope

Re: [HACKERS] Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1

2006-02-19 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi again, Meh, the list server didn't like the attached test script, so I put it here: http://people.debian.org/~mpitt/test-pg_restore-existing.sh Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a

Re: [HACKERS] Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1

2006-02-19 Thread Martin Pitt
g_restore: setting owner and privileges for ACL public pg_restore: setting owner and privileges for TABLE auxdata pg_restore: setting owner and privileges for TABLE userdata WARNING: errors ignored on restore: 1 pg_restore failed with 1 === new/userdata: === 42 256 === new/auxdata: === -1 -2 --

Re: [HACKERS] Adding an ignore list to pg_restore

2006-02-19 Thread Martin Pitt
ith a reasonably clean implementation and report back then. Thank you, and have a nice Sunday, Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [HACKERS] Adding an ignore list to pg_restore

2006-02-18 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi Tom! Tom Lane [2006-02-18 13:32 -0500]: > Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The core problem is that we want to not restore objects (mainly > > tables) in the destination database which already exist. > > Why is this a problem? It's already the def

[HACKERS] Adding an ignore list to pg_restore

2006-02-18 Thread Martin Pitt
e for actual restoration), or (2) save pg_dump output into a temporary file -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? signature.asc Descri

Re: [HACKERS] libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0

2005-06-12 Thread Martin Pitt
, and it's not really hard to maintain. But if it would go upstream, other vendors might benefit from that as well. However, as Alvaro already said, the patch should probably be refined to take the SONAME from the Makefile somehow instead of hardcoding it. Thanks and have a nice day! Mart

Re: [HACKERS] libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0

2005-02-10 Thread Martin Pitt
a infrastructure similar to mine, and at that point they will have precisely the same problems :-) Thanks for considering and have a nice day! Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [HACKERS] libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0

2005-02-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi! Tom Lane [2005-02-03 11:12 -0500]: > Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I am thinking the easiest solution will be to re-add get_progname() to > >> 8.0.X and bump the major for 8.1. > > > Seconded. Then we don't need another library vers

Re: [HACKERS] libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0

2005-02-08 Thread Martin Pitt
domain to "libpq4" as well? This should generally be done anyway, but at least we can live with one breakage of this rule (for libpq3), so that we don't need to mess with the old libpq3 package. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware

Re: [HACKERS] libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0

2005-02-03 Thread Martin Pitt
the postgresql-client package isn't (because it is on hold, or whatever), then this breaks the old postgresql-client as well. I'm fine with immediately bumping the SONAME too, but as I said, it's important that this happens upstream, not in the distributions. Thanks, Martin -- Ma

Re: [HACKERS] libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0

2005-02-03 Thread Martin Pitt
o drag this get_progname accident forever. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [HACKERS] libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0

2005-02-02 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi Tom! Tom Lane [2005-02-02 12:01 -0500]: > Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What would you propose as a solution? > > Do nothing. That's unfortunately not an option. > The problem you are raising isn't very serious since > RPM-style i

Re: [HACKERS] libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0

2005-02-02 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi! (sorry for the additional addresses; I'm not subscribed to -hackers, so my mail will last a while until it arrives there). Tom Lane [2005-02-02 11:07 -0500]: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin Pitt has detected that the libpq API has changed inco