Hi!

Tom Lane [2005-02-03 11:12 -0500]:
> Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I am thinking the easiest solution will be to re-add get_progname() to
> >> 8.0.X and bump the major for 8.1.
> 
> > Seconded. Then we don't need another library version, and it is still
> > not necessary to drag this get_progname accident forever.
> 
> We're going to stop dragging the accident now, not a year from now.
> 
> Putting get_progname back into libpq would require re-adding all of
> path.c, which creates many more issues than just adjusting
> SO_MAJOR_VERSION would do.

The consensus seems to be to just bump the SONAME. The next one will
definitively be "4" then? I would like to fix this in my packages
before I announce them for public testing, but this issue is the only
blocker to it. 

Will there be a new bugfix release soon?

Thanks for your work and have a nice day!

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                       http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer            http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian GNU/Linux Developer       http://www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to