Hi! Tom Lane [2005-02-03 11:12 -0500]: > Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I am thinking the easiest solution will be to re-add get_progname() to > >> 8.0.X and bump the major for 8.1. > > > Seconded. Then we don't need another library version, and it is still > > not necessary to drag this get_progname accident forever. > > We're going to stop dragging the accident now, not a year from now. > > Putting get_progname back into libpq would require re-adding all of > path.c, which creates many more issues than just adjusting > SO_MAJOR_VERSION would do.
The consensus seems to be to just bump the SONAME. The next one will definitively be "4" then? I would like to fix this in my packages before I announce them for public testing, but this issue is the only blocker to it. Will there be a new bugfix release soon? Thanks for your work and have a nice day! Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature