On Пт, 2015-10-16 at 09:02 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Dmitry Vasilyev pro.ru> wrote:
> > I think that function dsm_impl_windows() with EACCES error should
> > not
> > do ereport() with FATAL level. It works, but it is likely to make
>
I think that function dsm_impl_windows() with EACCES error should not
do ereport() with FATAL level. It works, but it is likely to make an
infinite loop if the user will receive EACCES error.
On Чт, 2015-10-15 at 17:46 +0300, Dmitry Vasilyev wrote:
> I’ve created 2 unprivileged users: user1
I’ve created 2 unprivileged users: user1 and user2; and registered 2
services thorough pg_ctl register respectively under these 2 users. If
first service is running second could not start and vice versa.
Dmitry Vasilyev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres
anyone can test it on Cygwin that wouldn't be a bad thing either.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
This patch is working for me,
binaries: https://goo.gl/32j7QE (MSVC 2010, build script here:
https://github.com/postgrespro/pgwininstall).
--
Dmitry Va
ase we want to
> retain shared memory handle for some purpose (future requirement)
> could
> be to send some signal to syslogger in restart path so that it can
> release
> the shared memory handle.
>
>
>
> With Regards,
> Amit Kapila.
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Specified patch with "ifdef WIN32" is working for me. Maybe it’s
necessary to check open handlers from replication for example?
--
Dmitry Vasilyev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
Hello Tom!
On Сб, 2015-10-10 at 10:55 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dmitry Vasilyev writes:
> > I have written, what service stopped. This action is repeatable.
> > You can run command 'psql -c "do $$ unpack p,1x8 $$ language
> > plperlu;"'
> > and afte
I have written, what service stopped. This action is repeatable.
You can run command 'psql -c "do $$ unpack p,1x8 $$ language plperlu;"'
and after this windows service will stop.
On Сб, 2015-10-10 at 10:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > On Fri, O
.
!>
--> >
> Hello Dmitry
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owne
> > r...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Dmitry Vasilyev
> > Sent: Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015 11:52
> > To: pgsql
not failing. So
what’s the problem? Why PostgreSQL is so strange on Windows?
--
Dmitry Vasilyev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
h
Hi!
By default, HAproxy configuration can not be changed without breaking a
connection with the client :)
--
Dmitry Vasilyev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 12:27 +1000, James Sewell wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have
We did not got any affect on core 64 with smt = 8, and we not have a 64
-cpu x86 machine with disable HT feature.
You can set scale > 1000 and with shared_buffers >> size of index
pgbench_accounts_pkey.
You can also increase the concurrency: not only access top of b-tree
index, but also to a speci
11 matches
Mail list logo