Using a Windows computer, editing the file:
C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\hosts
the localhost entry was remapped to the machine name by adding the following
line:
127.0.0.1
After this change, Postgres would not allow access using the address localhost.
Only using the machine name to acce
From: Adrian Klaver [mailto:adrian.kla...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 5:03 PM
To: Dann Corbit; 'pgsql-gene...@postgresql.org'
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql-9.3.1-1-windows-x64.exe does not install
correctly for me
On 10/31/2013 11:53 AM, Dann Corbit wrote:
> p
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 3:00 PM
To: Andrew Dunstan
Cc: Alvaro Herrera; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Robins Tharakan
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New regression
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 7:52 PM
To: Peter Eisentraut
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ancient sequence point bug
>Peter Eisentraut wr
-Original Message-
From: gsst...@gmail.com [mailto:gsst...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Greg Stark
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 5:16 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Bruce Momjian; Peter Geoghegan; Robert Haas; Tom Lane; PG Hackers
Subject: Re: Why do we still perform a check for pre-sorted input
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selection_algorithm#Linear_general_selection_algorithm_-_Median_of_Medians_algorithm
-Original Message-
From: gsst...@gmail.com [mailto:gsst...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Greg Stark
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 1:21 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Bruce Momjian; Peter Geog
"A Machine-Checked Proof of the Average-Case Complexity of Quicksort in Coq"
By Eelis van der Weegen and James McKinna
Institute for Computing and Information Sciences
Radboud University Nijmegen
Heijendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Contains a formal proof, validated by machine
-Original Message-
From: gsst...@gmail.com [mailto:gsst...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Greg Stark
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 11:39 AM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Bruce Momjian; Peter Geoghegan; Robert Haas; Tom Lane; PG Hackers
Subject: Re: Why do we still perform a check for pre-sorted input
Original Message-
>From: gsst...@gmail.com [mailto:gsst...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Greg Stark
>Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 4:59 PM
>To: Dann Corbit
>Cc: Bruce Momjian; Peter Geoghegan; Robert Haas; Tom Lane; PG Hackers
>Subject: Re: Why do we still perform a check for p
-Original Message-
From: Peter Geoghegan [mailto:peter.geoghega...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 12:00 PM
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: Dann Corbit; Robert Haas; Tom Lane; PG Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why do we still perform a check for pre-sorted input
within qsort variants?
On
>-Original Message-
>From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
>[mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
>Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 11:22 AM
>To: Peter Geoghegan
>Cc: Robert Haas; Tom Lane; PG Hackers
>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why do we still perform a check f
You can use the libpq API:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/interactive/libpq-copy.html
The Postgresql JDBC driver exposes COPY, IIRC.
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Xiong He
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 11:55 PM
To: Postgr
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Gaetano Mendola
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 2:54 PM
To: Peter Geoghegan; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CUDA Sorting
On 15/02/2012 23:11, Peter
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Nolan
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 11:51 AM
To: Joshua D. Drake
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What Would You Like To Do?
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Josh
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Davis [mailto:pg...@j-davis.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 11:44 AM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What was the exact version of PostgreSQL where
> the column name length changed fro
I need to know so that I can handle cases like:
Create table foolongcols(
nevermindthefurthermorejustpleadinselfdefense char(5),
nevermindthefurthermorejustpleadguilty char(5)
);
I assume that other object names (table name, function name, etc.) are
similarly affected. Is that
> -Original Message-
> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Dunstan
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 1:43 PM
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Peter Eisentraut; pgsql-hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ORDER BY 1 COLLATE
>
> On 04/18/20
Smells like April first to me.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools'_Day
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Rajasekhar Yakkali
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:08 AM
To: dp...@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-gene...@postgresql.org; pgsql
> -Original Message-
> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Hamza Bin Sohail
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 3:10 PM
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: [HACKERS] would hw acceleration help postgres (databases in
>
I am probably just being thick, but how is your idea different from create
domain:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-createdomain.html
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of ghatpa...@vsnl.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 0
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:and...@dunslane.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:47 PM
> To: Francis Markham
> Cc: Dann Corbit; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of Date/Time Input Interpretation
>
>
&g
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Francis Markham
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:13 PM
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: [HACKERS] Implementation of Date/Time Input Interpretation
Greetings all,
I am currently implementing a
Maybe this can be helpful:
http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_of_search=soft&words=fingerprint
http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_of_search=soft&words=image+recogniti
on
> -Original Message-
> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> ow...@postgresql.org] On Beh
> -Original Message-
> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Rayson Ho
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 9:39 AM
> To: David Fetter
> Cc: Andrew Dunstan; PG Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OpenVMS?
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at
See:
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/SQL/Benchmark/TPCH/
If the result is correct, then the problem queries should be added to
the regression test suite.
If the result is not correct, then perhaps they could get assistance on
proper configuration of PostgreSQL and rerun the tests.
--
Sent via pgsql-hacke
How can I obtain the source code for pg_bulkload?
I am interested in writing an API version, so that I can imbed this
loading facility into programs.
The page http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgbulkload/ has links to the
binaries, but I want the source.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgs
> -Original Message-
> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Pavel Stehule
> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 11:55 PM
> To: PostgreSQL Hackers
> Cc: Tom Lane
> Subject: [HACKERS] planner or statistical bug on 8.5
>
> Hello
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Bernd Helmle
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 8:47 AM
> To: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
> Cc: pgsql-hackers Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] boolean in C
>
> --On 16. Juli 200
s, but having the same manner for all human souls: in
short, behaving as if you were in Heaven, where there are no third-class
carriages, and one soul is as good as another.
For comparison, here is a recent message from Tom addressed to me, along with
my response:
Pg_ctl.exe is exiting with a success code from line 1946 of PG_CTL.C
This is not appropriate behavior for a service unless shutdown has been
requested.
> -Original Message-
> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Da
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:and...@dunslane.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 2:27 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Building Postgresql under Windows question
>
>
>
> Dann Corb
In this function:
static bool
test_postmaster_connection(bool do_checkpoint)
This code will never succeed:
snprintf(connstr, sizeof(connstr),
"dbname=postgres port=%s connect_timeout=5",
portstr);
for (i = 0; i < wait_seconds; i++)
{
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:and...@dunslane.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 12:42 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Building Postgresql under Windows question
>
>
>
> Dann Corbit wr
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:and...@dunslane.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 12:42 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Building Postgresql under Windows question
>
>
>
> Dann Corbit wr
We are still having trouble with the service controller pg_ctl.exe
vanishing after some period of time.
Hence I am doing debug builds from the source tree according to the
instructions found at:
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/install-win32-full.html
Specifically, I am using this
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Page [mailto:dp...@pgadmin.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 1:58 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Bill Luton; Larry McGhaw; Mike
McKee;
> Brian Fifer
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows installation service
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dann Corbit
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 12:30 PM
> To: 'Dave Page'
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Bill Luton; Larry McGhaw; Mike McKee;
> Brian Fifer
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Windows installation service
>
> > -
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Page [mailto:dp...@pgadmin.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:16 AM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Bill Luton; Larry McGhaw; Mike McKee;
> Brian Fifer
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows installation service
>
The Windows installation service uses pg_ctl to perform the network
start-up operation.
This program starts up the postmaster and exits.
The net effect of performing the operation in this manner is that the
Windows service manager sees the service as "not running" a few minutes
after the startup is
> -Original Message-
> From: Dann Corbit
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 3:50 PM
> To: pgsql-gene...@postgresql.org
> Subject: Multiple character encodings within a single database/table?
>
> If I have the C locale, can I have multiple character encodings
within:
&g
If you install with the PostgreSQL group's installer for Windows:
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary
And then install a second instance of PostgreSQL using the EnterpriseDB
one click installer:
http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/pgdownload.do#windows
An error may occur. It will occur, probab
> -Original Message-
> From: Dimitri Fontaine [mailto:dfonta...@hi-media.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 12:28 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Is there an official log reader for PostgreSQL?
>
> Hi,
>
&
I am interested in doing a near real time transaction processor. If
there is a place to find the specification for the log reader, I would
be keen to know it.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/ma
If Kerberos V5 is not installed on a Windows platform, the following
error dialog is returned upon attempted installation:
Posgres.exe - Unable to Locate Component
This application has failed to start because krb5_32.dll was not found.
Re-installing the application may fix this problem.
[OK]
--
> -Original Message-
> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 3:28 PM
> To: Stanislav Lacko
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Is a plan for lmza commpre
> -Original Message-
> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Joshua D. Drake
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 7:42 PM
> To: KaiGai Kohei
> Cc: Tom Lane; Ron Mayer; Josh Berkus; Robert Haas; Merlin Moncure;
> Jonah H. Harris; Gre
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:33 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Gregory Stark; Decibel!; Robert Haas; Bruce Momjian; Mark Wong;
> Heikki Linnakangas; Josh Berkus; Greg Smith; pgsql-
> [EMAIL PRO
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Gregory Stark
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:06 PM
> To: Decibel!
> Cc: Tom Lane; Dann Corbit; Robert Haas; Bruce Momjian; Mark Wong;
> Heikki Linnakangas; Josh Berkus; Greg S
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Haas
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 5:05 PM
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Mark Wong; Tom Lane; Heikki Linnakangas; Gregory Stark; Josh
> Berkus; Greg Smith; pgsql-hackers@postgres
Sorry about the HTML post, but I wanted to include the error form.
When trying to perform an upgrade with PostgreSQL 8.3.5 over 8.3.4, the
installer insists that PostgreSQL has failed to start.
However, I can see the processes in memory (it has indeed started) and
even attach with PG Admin
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 6:34 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: [HACKERS]; Sherry Griffin
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Strange query behavior where clause produces
odd
> behavior on '>'
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 5:31 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: [HACKERS]; Sherry Griffin
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Strange query behavior where clause produces
odd
> behavior on '>'
The following query:
SELECT * FROM Customers_connxstore where customerid > 'specd'
Returns the row containing Customers_connxstore.customerid == 'SPECD'
I would expect to get that row if the query was:
SELECT * FROM Customers_connxstore where customerid >= 'specd'
The other operators (<, <=, >,
>Hi Simon,
>
>He is going to do some investigation in the methods and
>write down the possibilities and then he is going to implement
>something from that for PostgreSQL.
>
>When will this work be complete? We are days away from completing main
>work on 8.4, so you won't get much discussion on this
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 9:04 PM
> To: Robert Haas
> Cc: Markus Wanner; Matthew T. O'Connor; Tom Lane; Greg Sabino Mullane;
> pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 1:28 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Tom Lane; Ryan Bradetich; Gregory Stark; pgsql-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 1:11 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Tom Lane; Ryan Bradetich; Gregory Stark; pgsql-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 12:32 PM
> To: Ryan Bradetich
> Cc: Gregory Stark; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
>
> "Ryan B
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 12:52 PM
> To: Bjorn Munch
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Whence cometh the data in
> src/test/regress/data/streets.data
From: Manoel Henrique [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 1:47 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join
optimization
The nodeMergejoin.c is the code for the Merge Join isn`t it? I am trying
When you install the source tree (e.g. in folder \postgresql-8.3.x) you
will want to examine nodeMergejoin.c typically found in a path similar
to this:
\postgresql-8.3.x\src\backend\executor\nodeMergejoin.c
Here are the comments from the version on my machine:
/*
* INTERFACE ROUTINES
*
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Xiao Meng
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 7:57 PM
> To: Simon Riggs
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH]-hash index improving
>
> Well, I'll do it after I fi
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Riggs
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:10 PM
> To: Jonah H. Harris
> Cc: Xiao Meng; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Kenneth Marshall
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH]-hash index improving
>
>
> On
We figured the problem out.
Our older version did not have the OS patch:
http://www.postgresqlforums.com/wiki/2007_Daylight_Savings_Time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dann Corbit
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:06 PM
To
It appears that the older versions of PostgreSQL (7.x) do not consider
the daylight savings time when using TIMESTAMP WITH TIMEZONE but the
most recent versions do (8.x).
Can someone tell me the exact PostgreSQL version number where the
behavior changed?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Wang
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 7:38 PM
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: [HACKERS] bug in numeric_power() function
>
> I expected 0 ^ 123.3 to be 0, but it repor
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Browne
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:56 AM
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: [HACKERS] Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA?
>
&g
http://www.scientificcomputing.com/ShowPR~PUBCODE~030~ACCT~300100~IS
SUE~0801~RELTYPE~HPCC~PRODCODE~~PRODLETT~C.html
http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_learn.html
http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_get.html
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 10:00 PM
> To: Warren Turkal
> Cc: Brendan Jurd; Ilya А. Кovalenko; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] operator suggest " in
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Hurt
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 6:42 AM
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sorting Improvements for 8.4
>
> While we're blue skying things, I've ha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory Stark
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 5:26 PM
> To: Jeff Davis
> Cc: Mark Mielke; Michał Zaborowski; Simon Riggs; Ron Mayer; pgsql-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS
P.S.
A beautiful paper on replacement selection is found here:
http://students.fim.uni-passau.de/~fickensc/Proseminar/Proseminar.pdf
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 3:10 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sorting Improvements for 8.4
>
> On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 14:41 -0800, Dann C
As long as sorting improvements are being considered, may I suggest an
experiment that uses a very simple model?
Assuming that you have K subfiles created by the initial sorting pass,
insert the top record of each file into a priority queue.
Then, emit records from the queue until the priority qu
From: Dann Corbit
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 5:58 PM
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Current code for function j2date does not have the
same correct dynamic range as older code.
> It may not matter to the PostgreSQL group, since nothing goes
> wrong until the year is 1,465,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 1:11 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Dumb question about binary cursors and
> #ifdefHAVE_INT6
> -Original Message-
> From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 1:11 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Dumb question about binary cursors and
> #ifdefHAVE_INT6
If I create a binary cursor on a recent version of PostgreSQL, how can I
tell if the timestamp data internally is an 8 byte double or an 8 byte
integer?
I see an #ifdef that changes the code path to compute timestamps as one
type or the other, but I do not know how to recognize the internal
format
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry McGhaw
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1:40 PM
> To: Martijn van Oosterhout
> Cc: Andrew Dunstan; Hannu Krosing; Tom Lane; Alvaro Herrera; Dann
Corbit;
> Gregory Stark; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Selectin
First a comment:
At CONNX Solutions Inc., we believe sincerely that we should do whatever
is necessary to make our customers prosper. This means creation of
excellent tools and being responsive to customer needs. Secondly, we
believe that we should treat the customers the way that we want to be
> -Original Message-
> From: Hannu Krosing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 10:43 PM
> To: Larry McGhaw
> Cc: Tom Lane; Alvaro Herrera; Dann Corbit; Gregory Stark; Martijn van
> Oosterhout; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS]
> -Original Message-
> From: Hannu Krosing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 8:42 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Tom Lane; Gregory Stark; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question
>
> Ühel kenal päeval,
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 3:35 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Gregory Stark; Martijn van Oosterhout;
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org;
> Larry McGhaw
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant quest
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 5:32 PM
> To: Larry McGhaw
> Cc: Alvaro Herrera; Dann Corbit; Gregory Stark; Martijn van
Oosterhout;
> pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selectin
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 5:12 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Larry McGhaw
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Got no response last time on setsockopt post,
so I
> thought I would
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Dunstan
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 5:12 PM
> To: Larry McGhaw
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question
>
>
>
> Larry McGhaw wr
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Jurka
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 5:04 PM
> To: Larry McGhaw
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question
>
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 4:35 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Larry McGhaw
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Got no response last time on setsockopt post,
so I
> thou
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 4:09 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Got no response last time on setsockopt post,
so I
> thought I would reiterate.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 3:50 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout; Alvaro Herrera; Gregory Stark; pgsql-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Larry McGhaw
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constan
> -Original Message-
> From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 3:44 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Tom Lane; Gregory Stark; Martijn van Oosterhout; pgsql-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Larry McGhaw
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a consta
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 3:41 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Larry McGhaw
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Got no response last time on setsockopt post,
so I
> thought I would
> -Original Message-
> From: Martijn van Oosterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 3:29 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Alvaro Herrera; Gregory Stark; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Larry
> McGhaw
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant questio
> -Original Message-
> From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 3:16 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Gregory Stark; Martijn van Oosterhout;
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org;
> Larry McGhaw
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant ques
These two calls make our remote queries via libpq about twice as fast on
average. It seems to me like it might be a nice addition to the core
product's libpq (I poked it into the spot where the Nagle algorithm is
turned off, but another place would be fine too). Can anyone give me a
reason why it
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregory Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 2:41 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Larry McGhaw
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question
>
> "D
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dann Corbit
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 1:52 PM
> To: Martijn van Oosterhout
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selectin
> -Original Message-
> From: Martijn van Oosterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 1:46 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:29:37PM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote:
> > O
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 1:32 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Gregory Stark; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question
>
> "Dann Corbit" <[EMAIL
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregory Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 12:48 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question
>
> "Dann Corbit" <[EMAIL PROT
1 - 100 of 463 matches
Mail list logo
