Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?

re department needs some work. For this, the PITR is a necessity, but also when comparing features with other DBs that people and businesses are currently familiar with. -- Austin Gonyou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Coremetrics, Inc. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?

e very interested in implementing PITR. We will > > tackle this for 7.5 if no one objects. > > I have put up a PITR project page: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/project -- Austin Gonyou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Coremetrics, Inc. ---

[HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?

Has this been beaten to death now? Just curious if PITR was in Dev tree yet. Been out of the loop. TIA. -- Austin Gonyou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Coremetrics, Inc. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Commercial binary support?

ary as it was accepted as the open default solution to a problem or whatever in an open code base. If the latter never occurs, then I'd say, yes, you *could[read: should?]* sell support for your modifications and call them your own and, depending on the license used, disclose not only the chan

Re: [HACKERS] Commercial binary support?

> little heated on -hackers. Hopefully you've not been to startled by this > outburst :-) Thanks much, and certainly not startled. I just don't like inciting a riot, if I wasn't trying to. ;) Thanks again all. > Robert Treat -- Austin Gonyou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [HACKERS] Commercial binary support?

I would also sincerely like to thank all who've responded as this has given a lot of insight, I think, for all of us involved thus far. It's good to have different perspectives, even if we don't all agree all the time. Thanks again. -- Austin Gonyou <[E

Re: [HACKERS] Commercial binary support?

On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 11:31, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Michael Meskes wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:19:35PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote: > > > I've been looking all over but I can't seem to see a company that is > > > provi

[HACKERS] Commercial binary support?

I've been looking all over but I can't seem to see a company that is providing *up-to-date* postgresql support and provides their own supported binaries. Am I barking up the wrong tree entirely here? TIA -- Austin Gonyou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Coremetrics, Inc. --

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 hot backup capabilities?

On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 01:00, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > Austin Gonyou wrote: > > > What facilities are/will be available for hot(online) backups with the > > 7.4 release? PITR, something else? TIA. > > pg_dump? > > Did you mean hot failover or hot backup? Postgre

[HACKERS] 7.4 hot backup capabilities?

What facilities are/will be available for hot(online) backups with the 7.4 release? PITR, something else? TIA. -- Austin Gonyou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Coremetrics, Inc. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensi

[HACKERS] Table Partitioning

re looking at moving to postgres from oracle. Thanks much. -- Austin Gonyou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Coremetrics, Inc. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: Tablespaces (was Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Physical Database

wn cvs or maybe the Postgres guys > will be nice and do a branch for us :) > > So far, Shridhar and Gavin seem interested?? > > Chris > > > ---(end of broadcast)--- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands

Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze

was a bad idea. But, I didn't find > anything like that on their Terms of Use > <http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6048&group_id=1> > page. The compiler farm has a relatively small number of platforms, but > perhaps it would be enough to get started

[HACKERS] Table partitioning question.

possible. I have to give my VP info on this relatively soon. Sorry for the urgent nature. -- Austin Gonyou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Coremetrics, Inc. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan i