I know I'm new to this list, but is OSDL's testing capabilities out of the question?
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 13:48, Thomas Swan wrote: > Nigel J. Andrews wrote: > > >On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Thomas Swan wrote: > > > > > >>Is it possible the sourceforge compile farms could be used for some of > >>the automated testing? I'm not sure how that system works, but it could > >>be worth looking into. > >> > >> > > > >Isn't the sourceforge license very scary and along the lines of "whatever you > >put on here we own it's just we tend not to persue that at the moment as > >there's not much money in it for us but that doesn't stop us from claiming it > >at some indeterminate time in the future"? > > > If it's that intrusive, then it was a bad idea. But, I didn't find > anything like that on their Terms of Use > <http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6048&group_id=1> > page. The compiler farm has a relatively small number of platforms, but > perhaps it would be enough to get started with at least verifying an > automated test would work. See Guide to the Sourceforge Compile Farm > <http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=762&group_id=1>. ... -- Austin Gonyou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Coremetrics, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
