On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Christian Kruse
wrote:
> On 25/02/14 16:11, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Reading this over, I'm not sure I understand why this is a CONTEXT at
>> all and not just a DETAIL for the particular error message that it's
>> supposed to be decorating. Generally CONTEXT should b
I assume we never came up with a TODO from this thread:
---
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:30:44PM +, Greg Stark wrote:
> At multiple conferences I've heard about people trying all sorts of
> gymnastics to avoid ANALYZE whic
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:42:08AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:30:15AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Why does this patch remove the errorMessage argument from
> >> pg_fe_getauthname? I gauge the amount of thought that went into
> >> that choice by t
Hi Heikki
We have linked git commits and reviews in a web interface. If you
enter a commit hash, you will be redirected to the email archive of
the peer review discussion:
http://cesel.encs.concordia.ca/git-reviewed-tracker.php
This work is part of my thesis, so feedback is much appreciated. If
y
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:43:06PM +0100, Piotr Marcinczyk wrote:
> > The alternative proposal that's been on the table for awhile (see the
> > preceding entry in the TODO list) is to remove the interval_justify_hours
> > call in timestamp_mi, which would also have the effect of fixing the
> > inco
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 09:20:39PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 08:34:29AM +0100, Antonin Houska wrote:
> > >>> You're right. I missed the fact that Postgres (unlike another DBMS that
> > >>> I worked with) allows for tablespace to be shared across databases.
> > >>
> > >>
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 09:08:31AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 07:18:04PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >> > OK, done with the attached patch Three is returned for status, but one
> >> > for other cases.
> >>
> >> I th
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:31:22AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Tomonari Katsumata writes:
>>> [ client_min_messages = info is not documented ]
>> That's intentional, because it's not a useful setting. Even more so
>> for the other two.
> Well, 'info' is between other sett
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:31:22AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomonari Katsumata writes:
> > [ client_min_messages = info is not documented ]
>
> That's intentional, because it's not a useful setting. Even more so
> for the other two.
Well, 'info' is between other settings we do document, so I am
Hello Mitsumasa-san,
New "\setrandom" interface is here.
\setrandom var min max [gaussian threshold | exponential threshold]
Attached patch realizes this interface, but it has little bit ugly codeing in
executeStatement() and process_commands()..
I think it is not too bad. The "ignore ext
Tomonari Katsumata writes:
> [ client_min_messages = info is not documented ]
That's intentional, because it's not a useful setting. Even more so
for the other two.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes
"MauMau" writes:
> Is PL/Java safe to use in terms of its threading design? I'm going to ask
> the PL/Java community about this too, but I'd ask for opinions here because
> I believe people in this community have seasoned knowledge of OS and SPI.
> To put the question in other words, is it saf
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:07:21PM -0500, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
>> Yes, this is a performance patch, but as the subject says, it saves a few
>> instructions. I don't know how to write a test case that can measure savings
>> of
>> skipping a few instructions in a startup seq
On Saturday, March 8, 2014, Ishaya Bhatt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to analyze join performance. But I see that even for a table
> having 100,000 rows and join attribute as primary key, postgres always
> performs hash join.
>
> Can anyone please tell me under which conditions merge join or nest
On 03/07/2014 07:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Patrick Curran writes:
We use Postgres in our product and we have a client that requires a
static code analysis scan to detect vulnerabilities. They are concerned
because the tool (Veracode) found several flaws in Postgres and they
believe there might be
Hi,
I am trying to analyze join performance. But I see that even for a table
having 100,000 rows and join attribute as primary key, postgres always
performs hash join.
Can anyone please tell me under which conditions merge join or nested loop
join is invoked?
Thanks and Regards,
Ishaya
Hi,
I noticed that the behavior of client_min_messages do not have
a consistency in document and 'pg_settings', postgresql.conf.
the behaviro is:
I can set 'INFO', 'FATAL' and 'PANIC' as the valid value.
postgres=# set client_min_messages to info;
SET
postgres=# set client_min_m
Hello,
Is PL/Java safe to use in terms of its threading design? I'm going to ask
the PL/Java community about this too, but I'd ask for opinions here because
I believe people in this community have seasoned knowledge of OS and SPI.
To put the question in other words, is it safe to load a mult
18 matches
Mail list logo
