On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 09:20:39PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 08:34:29AM +0100, Antonin Houska wrote: > > >>> You're right. I missed the fact that Postgres (unlike another DBMS that > > >>> I worked with) allows for tablespace to be shared across databases. > > >> > > >> I have update the C comment: > > >> > > >> < * Notice that relNode is only unique within a particular > > >> database. > > >> --- > > >> > * Notice that relNode is only unique within a particular > > >> tablespace. > > > > > > Yep. But the new text is no more correct than the old text. Did you > > > read what I wrote upthread? > > > > Perhaps "... unique within a particular (tablespace, database) > > combination." ? > > Oh, I thought people just wanted the text to be consistent with other > mentions, rather than improving it. Attached is a patch which updates > comments about the tablespace/database issue.
Applied. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
