Thanks Bruce.
Yes for me main problem was to make assumption that a 5-digit number is a
year,
as was bit worried about side effect of that assumption in the date/time
module. I
did tested patch shared by you with various test and so far it looks good
to me.
I would like reviewer to review/test th
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:40:51AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> >> Shouldn't we do it for Set Constraints as well?
>> >
>> > Oh, very good point. I missed that one. Updated patch attached.
>
> I am glad you are seeing things I am not. :-)
>
On Oct 3, 2013 2:47 AM, "Michael Paquier" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Magnus Hagander
wrote:
> > Right now, if you use
> >
> > pg_basebackup -Ft -D -
> >
> > you get a tarfile, written to stdout, for redirection.
> >
> > However, if you use:
> >
> > pg_basebackup -Fp -D -
> >
> >
On 10/02/2013 05:47 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Right now, if you use
>>
>> pg_basebackup -Ft -D -
>>
>> you get a tarfile, written to stdout, for redirection.
>>
>> However, if you use:
>>
>> pg_basebackup -Fp -D -
>>
>> you get a plaint
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Right now, if you use
>
> pg_basebackup -Ft -D -
>
> you get a tarfile, written to stdout, for redirection.
>
> However, if you use:
>
> pg_basebackup -Fp -D -
>
> you get a plaintext (unpackaged) backup, in a directory called "-".
>
> I ca
(2013/10/02 17:37), KONDO Mitsumasa wrote:
> I want to submit new project in pgFoundery project.
Our new project was approved yesterday!
Thanks very much for pgFoundery crew.
Regards,
--
Mitsumasa KONDO
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postg
On 2013-10-02 17:32, Josh Berkus wrote:
No fundamental reason; I'm hoping ZFS will be supported in addition to
btrfs, but I don't have any systems with ZFS filesystems at the moment
so I haven't been able to test it or find out the mechanisms ZFS uses
for cloning. On btrfs cloning is implemented
> No fundamental reason; I'm hoping ZFS will be supported in addition to
> btrfs, but I don't have any systems with ZFS filesystems at the moment
> so I haven't been able to test it or find out the mechanisms ZFS uses
> for cloning. On btrfs cloning is implemented with a custom
> btrfs-specific i
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Ants Aasma wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Ants Aasma wrote:
>>> I haven't reviewed the code in as much detail to say if there is an
>>> actual race here, I tend to think there's probably not, but
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Ants Aasma wrote:
>> I haven't reviewed the code in as much detail to say if there is an
>> actual race here, I tend to think there's probably not, but the
>> specific pattern that I had in mind is that with
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 05:23:31PM +0300, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
> On 02/10/13 17:18, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >On 10/01/2013 06:31 PM, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
> >>Add file cloning as an alternative data transfer method to pg_upgrade.
> >>Currently only btrfs is supported, but copy-on-write clo
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Ants Aasma wrote:
> I haven't reviewed the code in as much detail to say if there is an
> actual race here, I tend to think there's probably not, but the
> specific pattern that I had in mind is that with the following actual
> code:
hm. I think there *is* a race.
> "Merlin" == Merlin Moncure writes:
>> Who is pgFoundery administrator or board member now? I would like
>> to send e-mail them. At least, it does not have information and
>> support page in pgFoundery homepage.
Merlin> I have not been able to get in contact with Marc either to
Merlin>
On 9/29/13 9:41 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 09/29/2013 10:38 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Sun, 2013-09-29 at 22:33 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Well if these are not meant to be changed then not being able to write
them in your git repo might be a clue to that.
Git doesn't support setting
2013/10/2 Andres Freund
> Hi,
>
> On 2013-10-02 18:56:51 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > this proposal is related to reported issue
> >
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e1vquta-0007y4...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
> >
> >
> > We can directly modify any fields of int, float, doubl
Hi,
On 2013-10-02 18:56:51 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> this proposal is related to reported issue
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e1vquta-0007y4...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
>
>
> We can directly modify any fields of int, float, double arrays (when result
> size will be immutab
Hello
this proposal is related to reported issue
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e1vquta-0007y4...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
We can directly modify any fields of int, float, double arrays (when result
size will be immutable). This trick is used now for acceleration of some
aggregates.
Ideas,
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Marc Fournier wrote:
>
> direct_cp project approved, sorry for delay …
>
> as to the the mailing list issue, where did you send it? can you resend it
> to me here?
sure -- I had sent it initially to the www list then directly to you..
"Trying to figure out wha
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:00:30AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:42:17AM +, Haribabu kommi wrote:
> >> If the changes are very high to deal all scenarios,
> >>
> >> I feel it is better do it only in scenarios whe
direct_cp project approved, sorry for delay …
as to the the mailing list issue, where did you send it? can you resend it to
me here?
On 2013-10-02, at 6:46 , Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:37 AM, KONDO Mitsumasa
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to submit new project in pgFo
On 2013-10-02 11:06:59 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2013-10-02 10:56:38 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Andres Freund
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 2013-10-01 10:07:19 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> >> - It seems
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-10-02 10:56:38 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> > On 2013-10-01 10:07:19 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> >> - It seems that HeapSatisfiesHOTandKeyUpdate is now
>> >> HeapSatisfiesHOTan
On 2013-10-02 10:56:38 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2013-10-01 10:07:19 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> - It seems that HeapSatisfiesHOTandKeyUpdate is now
> >> HeapSatisfiesHOTandKeyandCandidateKeyUpdate. Considering I think this
> >> was
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-10-01 10:07:19 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> - It seems that HeapSatisfiesHOTandKeyUpdate is now
>> HeapSatisfiesHOTandKeyandCandidateKeyUpdate. Considering I think this
>> was merely HeapSatisfiesHOTUpdate a year ago, it's hard not to
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Huchev wrote:
>> How come any compressor which could put some competition to pglz is
>> systematically pushed out of the field on the ground of unverifiable "legal
>> risks" ?
>
> Because pglz has been around
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:42:17AM +, Haribabu kommi wrote:
>> If the changes are very high to deal all scenarios,
>>
>> I feel it is better do it only in scenarios where the use cases needs it,
>> until
>> it is not confusing users.
>>
>
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Ants Aasma wrote:
>> So we need a read barrier somewhere *after* reading the flag in
>> RecoveryInProgress() and reading the shared memory structures, and in
>> theory a full barrier if we are going to be wri
Right now, if you use
pg_basebackup -Ft -D -
you get a tarfile, written to stdout, for redirection.
However, if you use:
pg_basebackup -Fp -D -
you get a plaintext (unpackaged) backup, in a directory called "-".
I can't think of a single usecase where this is a good idea. Therefor,
I would su
On 10/01/2013 06:31 PM, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
Add file cloning as an alternative data transfer method to pg_upgrade.
Currently only btrfs is supported, but copy-on-write cloning is also
available on at least ZFS. Cloning must be requested explicitly and if
it isn't supported by the operating
On 02/10/13 17:18, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 10/01/2013 06:31 PM, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
Add file cloning as an alternative data transfer method to pg_upgrade.
Currently only btrfs is supported, but copy-on-write cloning is also
available on at least ZFS. Cloning must be requested explicitly a
On 2013-10-02 08:39:59 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> wow -- thanks for your review and provided detail. Considering there
> are no examples of barrier instructions to date, I think some of your
> commentary should be included in the in-source documentation.
I think most of it is in README.barrie
Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
> Add file cloning as an alternative data transfer method to pg_upgrade.
> Currently only btrfs is supported, but copy-on-write cloning is also
> available on at least ZFS. Cloning must be requested explicitly and if
> it isn't supported by the operating system or filesy
Bruce Momjian escribió:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 08:59:42AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:12:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > If we had not made massive cleanup changes years ago, our code would not
> > > be as good as it is today. By avoiding cleanup to reduce the
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:37 AM, KONDO Mitsumasa
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to submit new project in pgFoundery project.
>
> I submitted new project which is WAL archive copy tool with directIO method in
> pgFoundery homepage 2 weeks ago, but it does not have approved and responded
> at
> all:-(
>
>
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/27/13 3:00 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> Attached is simplified patch that replaces the spinlock with a read
>> barrier based on a suggestion made by Andres offlist.
>
> This patch doesn't apply.
works for me:
merlin@mmoncure-ubuntu:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:12:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> If we had not made massive cleanup changes years ago, our code would not
> be as good as it is today. By avoiding cleanup to reduce the burden on
> people who use our code, we are positioning our code on a slow decline
> in clarity.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:40:06AM +0400, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> I found in my archives several logos. The oldest one comes from postgres95
> time. I recall that logo with cheetah was made by Bruce (?)
No, I don't remember who did that cheetah.
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
En
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 08:59:42AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:12:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > If we had not made massive cleanup changes years ago, our code would not
> > be as good as it is today. By avoiding cleanup to reduce the burden on
> > people who use ou
>
> Looks pretty good. Do you want to package up the patch with your
> change and do the honors and re-submit it? Thanks for helping out so
> much!
Sure, will do. Need to add a bit of documentation explaining
statistics session as well.
I did some more basic testing around pg_stat_statements.max, n
On Tuesday, October 1, 2013, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
>> I don't think it has anything to do with the conditional index -- it's
>> the functional based. For some reason postgres always wants to post
>> filter (note the filter step below):
>>
>
On 10/2/13 5:12 AM, Asif Naeem wrote:
> Neither git nor patch command apply the patch successfully. Can you
> please guide ?. Thanks.
Works for me. Check that your email client isn't mangling line endings.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes t
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:37 PM, KONDO Mitsumasa
wrote:
> Who is pgFoundery administrator or board member now? I would like to send
> e-mail
> them. At least, it does not have information and support page in pgFoundery
> homepage.
Why don't you consider github as a potential solution? You could u
Hello all
there are no comments, so I'll close this topic
This feature is ready for commit
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2013/10/1 Pavel Stehule
> Hello all
>
> I am thinking so almost all is done
>
> I fixed a help and appended a simple test
>
> But it is a cosmetic changes.
>
> Comments?
>
> Rega
Thank you Peter.
When I try to apply the patch on latest PG source code on master branch, it
gives the following error message i.e.
> asif$ git apply /Users/asif/core/Patch\:\ Add\ use\ of\
> asprintf\(\)/v2-0001-Add-use-of-asprintf.patch
> /Users/asif/core/Patch: Add use of
> asprintf()/v2-0001-A
> Hi,
>
> I want to submit new project in pgFoundery project.
>
> I submitted new project which is WAL archive copy tool with directIO method in
> pgFoundery homepage 2 weeks ago, but it does not have approved and responded
> at
> all:-(
>
> Who is pgFoundery administrator or board member now?
Hi,
I want to submit new project in pgFoundery project.
I submitted new project which is WAL archive copy tool with directIO method in
pgFoundery homepage 2 weeks ago, but it does not have approved and responded at
all:-(
Who is pgFoundery administrator or board member now? I would like to send
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Amit Kapila escribió:
>> While reading documentation for SET command, I observed that FROM
>> CURRENT syntax and its description is missing from SET command's
>> syntax page (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-set.html).
>>
>> Do
47 matches
Mail list logo
