Theres a script at http://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/other/makevcgen which
may work, I've not tried it, but someone may want to give it a spin.
Combining it with the software at http://unxutils.sourceforge.net could give
us a MS build environment which only relies on installation support programs
r
> > Ross, you make some powerful arguments here. Probably the most
> > significant was the idea that you need a unique identifier for every
> > row, and it should be of a consistent type, which primary key is not.
>
> I don't see why you need a unqiue identifier per row, nor do I see why,
> if yo
[Moving -> -hackers]
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:00:08AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bradley Baetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > However, its much faster (although not as fast as sticking the DISTINCT
> > in there myself), but the actual rows coming from the sort is really odd
> > - where is that n
No actually, the docs.
I need to know for the phpPgAdmin project...
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, 26 January 2003 10:03 AM
> To: Christopher Kings-Lynne
> Cc: Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unquoted special constants
>
>
>
>
> I think we have to accept the statement that in 7.2.X malicious SQL
> queries can cause database failure, and fixing one or two of the ten
> known problems doesn't change that fact.
>
> I don't have a problem with releasing 7.2.4 and including all the fixes,
> including security fixes, but I don'
> I tried initdb -E EUC_CN --no-locale and tested "order by" with the same
> Chinese data, I got the same result: the "order by" clause does not have
> any effect. The locale on my Redhat Linux 8.0 is en_US.UTF-8.
>
> By the way, the manual page for initdb does not show an option
> --no-locale.
Dave Page wrote:
Hi Justin,
Does it use the Microsoft Installer service so we can provide a merge
module for embedded installations in other products as we do for
psqlODBC? If not, I for one will probably end up redoing it all anyway
:-(
Hi Dave,
It's an installation "setup.exe" type of thing
Dave Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So for a "select a, b, a+b as sum from c" returns c.a, c.b, ?table?.sum
This might be something to consider as part of the planned protocol
overhaul. We cannot simply change the returned column names --- at
least not without breaking a lot of application
> Tatsuo,
>
> I have been trying to get the sorting of Chinese data in Postgresql
> 7.3.1 to work without much success. Here is what I did.
>
> I rebuilt the executables with ./configure -enable-multibyte=ENC_CN on
> a RedHat Linux 8.0 Pentium 2 system. The build was successful. I created
> a t
--
Dave Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cramer Consulting
This is useful for some O/R tools. The JDBC spec has a getTableName method for each
column in a result set.
One issue which will come up is what to do with aggregate, and computed values. For
now, we could return null
So for a "select a, b
Are there no already-written converters from Makefile to VC project
files?
---
Curtis Faith wrote:
> I (Curtis Faith) previously wrote:
> > > The Visual C++ Workspaces and Projects files are actually
> > > text files that ha
Bruce, I've finished digging for stuff that seems to be appropriate to
back-patch for 7.2.4. Do you have time to generate the release notes
and brand the release? Attached are the CVS commit messages for all
the changes in that branch since 7.2.3.
regards, tom lane
2003
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Ross, you make some powerful arguments here. Probably the most
> significant was the idea that you need a unique identifier for every
> row, and it should be of a consistent type, which primary key is not.
I don't see why you need a unqiue identifier p
Ross, you make some powerful arguments here. Probably the most
significant was the idea that you need a unique identifier for every
row, and it should be of a consistent type, which primary key is not.
We clearly need a GUC parameter to turn on/off oids. But it seems we
will always need the abi
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Clift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 26 January 2003 03:12
> To: PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List; PostgreSQL Cygwin Mailing List
> Subject: [CYGWIN] Have a PG 7.3.1 Windows (cygwin) easy
> installer... now what to do with it?
>
> Anyway, spent the
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 13:53, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> This year, my team is planning on improving the MONEY type. Of course, we can
> always make it a user defined type if PostgreSQL doesn't want it. We will at
> least put it into contrib. However, if people think that it is useful and
> wa
Should it be saying, "Temporarily Unavailable"?
Regards,
--
Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copeland Computer Consulting
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [
I thought I sent off an email about how to do it, OK here goes:
Create a working minimal cygwin with postgres install.
Delete unwanted utilities and files.
Test if you can start, stop, initdb, and query Postgres.
Use the attached pgsql.iss script to make the install.
Notes:
My version of the cons
On Friday 24 January 2003 19:17, Josh Berkus wrote:
> The MONEY type is depreciated, and should have been removed from the
> Postgres source but was missed as an oversight. Use NUMERIC instead.
Note that not all of us agree. I had to change all of our fields from MONEY
to NUMERIC recently beca
Justin Clift wrote:
Since March 2002 (less than 1 year ago), it's
been downloaded about 120,000,000 times. Wow. 120 Million downloads in
less than 1 year. That's a pretty popular IDE (16th most popular
project on SourceForge)
Arrrgh. Thought that sounded a bit too high.
Wrong column, i
Hannu Krosing wrote:
Bruce Momjian kirjutas P, 26.01.2003 kell 05:07:
Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I don't see a strong reason not
to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already
requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well req
Bruce Momjian kirjutas P, 26.01.2003 kell 05:07:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I don't see a strong reason not
> > > to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already
> > > requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require
22 matches
Mail list logo
