Bruce Momjian kirjutas P, 26.01.2003 kell 05:07: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I don't see a strong reason not > > > to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already > > > requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require the full > > > shell environment. > > > > Indeed. I think the goal here is to have a port that *runs* in native > > Windows; but I see no reason not to require Cygwin for *building* it. > > Agreed. I don't mind Cygwin if we don't have licensing problems with > distributing a Win32 binary that used Cygwin to build. I do have a > problem with MKS toolkit, which is a commerical purchase. I would like > to avoid reliance on that, though Jan said he needed their bash.
IIRC mingw tools had win-native (cygwin-less) bash at http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/ -- Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
